This is the second of the weekly round-ups of Covid vaccine safety reports and news compiled by a group of medical doctors who are monitoring developments but prefer to remain anonymous in the current climate (find the first one here). By no means is this part of an effort to generate alarm about the vaccines or dissuade anyone from getting inoculated. It should be read in conjunction with Lockdown Sceptics‘ other posts on vaccines, which include both encouraging and not so encouraging developments. At Lockdown Sceptics we report all news about the vaccines whether positive or negative and give no one advice about whether they should or should not be taken. Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine; we see our job as to report the facts, not advocate for or against a particular policy. The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they’re in use under temporary and not full market authorisation. This has been done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety. For a summary of that data, see this preamble to the Government’s page on the Yellow Card reporting system. We publish information and opinion to inform public debate and help readers come to their own conclusions about what is best for them, based on the available data.
News Round-up
- The U.S. CDC is investigating several dozen reports of heart inflammation in teenagers and young adults after receipt of the Covid mRNA vaccines, reports the New York Times
- According to the India Times, heart attacks and strokes are the leading causes of death among vaccine recipients
- A study in the journal Cureus claims there’s a link between receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine and the onset of Type 2 Diabetes
- America’s Frontline Doctors has done a cost/benefit analysis of the Pfizer vaccine
- The Royal College of Emergency Medicine, The Society of Acute Medicine and Royal College of Physicians have released guidance on treating blood clots caused by the AstraZeneca vaccine
- According to articles in the BMJ and the Telegraph, there are still concerns about giving the Covid vaccines to Children. The AstraZeneca trial involving children and teens has been suspended following fears of blood clots. HART has petitioned Parliament not to give Covid vaccines to children until Phase 3 Trials are complete
- In the U.S., the FDA has given approval for children to receive the Pfizer vaccination following recommendations from the CDC ACIP Committee
- An article in the Journal of Experimental and Clinical Transplantation addresses key concerns about COVID-19 vaccines (pre-print)
- Three people have died in Scotland from what are believed to be side effects of the vaccines, as reported by the BBC and Telegraph
- The BMJ and the UN have both published advice about how to counteract “vaccine hesitancy”, acknowledging that “when you look at hesitancy and parental vaccine hesitancy in the U.S., the group who is most likely to purposefully choose to not vaccinate are highly educated. In speaking with them, these are people who have read the primary literature themselves, and they’re correctly interpreting it, so it’s not a misunderstanding.” (p.26 of the UN Guide to Covid Vaccine Communications)
- EudraVigilance – the equivalent of the Yellow Card reporting system in the EU – has logged reports claiming 10,570 people have died and 405,259 have suffered injuries following receipt of the vaccine in the EU up to May 8th
- VAERS – the American version of the Yellow Card reporting system – has logged reports claiming 5,888 have died from vaccine side effects in the U.S. since 1990, of which 4,196 (71%) are linked to Covid vaccines administered in the last five months
Summary of Adverse Events UK
According to an updated report published on May 20th (covering the period up to May 12th), the MHRA Yellow Card reporting system has recorded a total of 822,078 events, based on 235,223 reports. The total number of fatalities reported is 1,178.
Key Summary of Adverse Events (for full table see below)
- Acute Cardiac events = 8,858
- Anaphylaxis = 946
- Blood Disorders = 11,409
- Migraine = 7,547
- Eye Disorders = 12,762
- Blindness = 212
- Psychiatric Disorders = 15,926
- Spontaneous Abortions/Miscarriage= 135
- Abdominal Pain = 9,346
- Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy = 915
- Disturbances in Consciousness = 10,874
- Strokes and CNS haemorrhages = 1605
- Guillain Barre Syndrome = 253
- Tremor = 9,404
- Thrombosis & Embolism (All types) = 4,347
- Seizures = 1,786
- Paralysis = 668
- Haemorrhage (All types) = 2,616
- Vertigo/Tinnitus (Inner Ear) = 5,391
- Reproductive/Breast = 5,099
Adverse Event Analysis
Pfizer now has one Yellow Card in 355 doses, 2.9 adverse reactions (i.e., symptoms) per card, one fatal reaction in 55,080 doses. AstraZeneca has one Yellow Card in 188 doses, 3.7 adverse reactions per card, one fatal reaction in 41,858 doses. Moderna has one Yellow Card in 137 doses, 2.9 adverse reactions per card, one fatal reaction in 50,000 doses.
Moderna at the moment has reporting rate even worse than AstraZeneca. A point of note is that the Pfizer product always ends up with an average of 2.86 adverse events per card – not only was it the same this week but Moderna also had the same figure of 2.86.
Yellow Card Reports Summary
Source: Pfizer; Moderna; Astrazeneca; Unspecified. “F” denotes fatal.
Suspected Adverse Events in the U.K. as Reported in the Media
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I haven’t read any of the reports but 13 are listed.
For crying out loud WTF is going on when those who can and should do not speak out?
It’s bizarre. Any other medicine or vaccine with this level of adverse reactions would have been pulled immediately, even with emergency use. This happened with the last swine flu pandemic in 2009 and the one in 1976.
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” ― EdmundBurke
Exploring the EuDraVigiliance database on adverse reactions is not easy, no way I have found to go straight to the covid vaccine records. You need to start here:
https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html
On that page select “C”, and on the page that appears, you’ll find (along with 500 other drugs starting with “C”)
You then take one of those links to your favourite poison.
I followed the steps but cannot see anywhere if there is a statement on the total of deaths and adverse reactions .we can do the maths ourselves using all reports but how can we confirm -to people questioning it – the number of 10,570 deaths ? thanks , let me know if you can
i just went on Gofundme and put vaccine in the search terms. It’s horrific.
Why aren’t these cases being reported? It’s not just the deaths. Paralysis. Strokes. Massive disability. Young people.
It’s unbelievable. It’s clear that this is now a death cult and depopulation is the agenda. Now the unvaxxed are being called “the other” as I have predicted on here weeks ago.
We need to start a campaign of civil disobedience. We are currently in the majority and have all the fighting-age individuals in our ranks – something the idiot “journalists” writing about the “unvaxxed solution” haven’t managed to figure out.
If the civil disobedience doesn’t work, well….we are going to have to do what we are going to have to do. I can’t even believe I’m typing this, but, I will die on my feet, not live on my knees.
Catherine Austin Fitts, The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine
is worthwhile reading.
She said something during a video interview that resonated quite strongly with me.
We have to make a decision which is the most important to us – our life or our freedom.
Like her, I choose freedom.
Life to me isn’t worth living, otherwise.
Think Tony Abbott said something similar like “people used to give up their lives for freedom now they’re giving up freedom for their lives” or something similar.
Fully agree baboon!
Thank you Will. This is a far more important issue than the lockdowns now, as your comment section demonstrates. Please do not tow the line on this. We are now seeing major newspapers printing articles about “what is to be done about ‘anti-vaxxers’. This is going to cause far more harm to society than lockdowns ever could. We are getting dangerously close to a two-tier society and, I fear, even concentration camps and a “final solution” to the unvaccinated. I’m not even joking. The problem is that the “carrot” of vaccination follows the ever-shifting goalposts as with everything else. “Three weeks to flatten the curve”. “We just need to vaccinate the most vulnerable and then we can go back to normal”. “We just need to vaccinate the under 50s and then we can go back to normal”. “We just need to vaccinate the under 40s and then we can go back to normal”. “We just need to vaccinate the over 12s and then we can go back to normal”. “We just need to vaccinate newborns and toddlers and then we can go back to normal”. “You just need an annual booster and everything will go back to normal”. “You just… Read more »
Best comment of the day – nay of the week!
“By no means is this part of an effort to raise an alarm or dissuade anyone from being inoculated…”
Well, it should be!
We’re long past the point where fence-sitting is a viable option. Hopefully Will can see that Fox News is now all over this, making it an acceptable stance for people on the Right to talk about sceptically.
I would note that LeftLockdownSceptics hasn’t been afraid to go all in on vaccine criticism.
https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/2021/05/have-you-had-your-jab-yet-part-1/
Thank you. Absolutely brilliant article. The best yet, highly recommend. Can’t believe I’m extolling the virtues of a leftist rag – strange times indeed!!
Agree.
An extremely well researched and well written article which is worthy of wider circulation.
I have passed it on to an army Vet pal so that will send it round the houses.
Yes indeed, and there’s a Part 2 as well
I would never have believed I would read Conservative Woman, so here we are
This has been done on account of the emergency situation
It’s a shame you have to ruin a very important post with fakery like this. There is no emergency. The IFR of Covid19 is 0.15%. There never was an emergency and there certainly isn’t one now, other than the emergency of getting guilty people locked up for the rest of their lives. Genocider Zahawi and the genociders from the MHRA for one. That is the only goal now. Nothing else matters. Brits will keep getting jabbed until someone ends the process altogether. It’s time to come out of the woodwork, put your shit kicking boots on and form groups with other medics and legal experts and scientists who have the expertise. Nothing else matters. Legal action. Prosecutions. Jail time for the guilty. Then change for the better.
Great post.
I found pic related on twitter earlier – this is the opportunity to share it.
Love the pic!
Reiner Fuellmich in his podcast with Dellingpole says that it is a policy of population reduction via the jab.
“There is no emergency.”
As said – there hasn’t even been an ‘epidemic’ in the community, using the normal definition.
Thank you for including this section on vaccine damage. it is otherwise hard work for Joe Public to pull out the stats on this- strangely enough, these numbers do not run alongside the MSM Corona numbers they relish publishing every day.
We are reaching the point, now, where children and young people will be coerced into having these injections.
These injections are of no benefit to them ( they are not 82 years old with 2.7 co-morbidities)
These injections are of no benefit to “society”
Some young people will certainly die, be maimed or have their health destroyed by these injections.
All to placate the paranoia of the teaching unions and the cowed general public.
I know of an 18 year old boy with his whole life ahead of him – someone who, if he fulfils his massive potential, could be a shining light of the future – who went for his jab last week because he “wants to be able to travel”. I am crossing my fingers that he doesn’t suffer damage from what has been administered to him.
My Mum is currently in an Acute Medical Unit following a catastrophic decline in her cognitive function and increasing confusion, anxiety and loss of vision.
All this started suddenly, approx 5 days after her 2nd Astra Zeneca vaccine (5 weeks ago); she was absolutely fine before that!
It has been an uphill struggle to get medical attention, and we’ve been continually fobbed off. The doctor qe eventually got out last week suggested ‘talking therapies’!
It now seems she may have been having brain blood clots/haemorrhages since the 2nd vaccine. I don’t know if she’ll recover or if too much damage has now been done, but I FULLY blame the AZ vaccine for causing my Mum’s illness.
Please, please PLEASE report it to the MHRA yellow card system.
I have witnessed similar among elderly relatives – maybe not quite as catastrophic as your mum has suffered, which I am sorry to hear about, but marked downturn in cognitive functioning, memory and eyesight, following the jabs and it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that it is the jabs which have caused it.
I am so sorry to hear this. I cannot believe what is happening and I have nothing but the highest hopes your mother will be OK.
Fauci, Ferguson, Johnson, WHO, The Lancet and the gang are liars, as reported in this esteemed organ. Therefore the scientific reply to their order to pump experimental potions into our family is “Get lost.”
The infallible ‘tell’ is the suppression of counter-views. Same with Global Warming, same with election fraud, same with Woke. The Lockdown and the vaccines are just Liberal Fascism proving who’s the boss.
Evil is amongst us. To do nothing is no longer an option. Do what you can, in whichever way you can, but do not stay silent. The slaughter and denigration of humanity has been going on for over a 150 years now. It is time to bring those responsible to supreme justice.
“The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they’re in use under temporary and not full market authorisation. This has been done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety.”
You have omitted that these vaccines emergency authorisation required that there were no effective alternatives or treatments . We are now starting to see that alternatives have been shunned and suppressed. Weinstein and his wife cover this :
https://youtu.be/zfqxCkJw0Rk
Perhaps a line to recognise this important point could be added to the preamble?
I would add that I suppose its too much to ask that the ‘encouraging efficacy’ data is corrected to show absolute rather than relative numbers, which would show approx 1% efficacy of reducing major symptoms only. ‘Safety’ cannot seriously be included in this statement.
Also they are in use under emergency authorisation not ‘temporary’ as you correctly point out.Alternative treatment has been available and used throughout the world from day one. It is illegal to authorise a new drug without full clinical trials under these circumstances.
Indeed. I would add that those of us determined not to take the c-vax jab on principle or on rational evaluation of the risk, do consider purchasing some ivermectin. Not necessarily for this cycle of virus but for the next. In my darker days I think that if this pathetic version were engineered to start the cycle of control, a different and actually more dangerous version could be waiting in the wings to do real damage.
One can get it from a huge variety of Indian suppliers on India mart. I’m waiting for a pack of 100. I will then verify it with a local chemist. If it turns out to be real, I may get a larger shipment.
This series still on YouTube covers doctors working with ivermectin:
Zimbabwe: https://youtu.be/oYCRV6RUKBQ
India: https://youtu.be/BWZHmowjAb0
I got a supply of HCQ from Canadian source just after France took all the supplies off the shelves of pharmacies. Its good to be prepared.
Wow, those scummy BMJ and UN articles are packed to the gills with seriously sinister controlling language and nudging behaviours.
Anything at all they want me to do inclines me to the opposite – at least ask some questions, sheep out there!
Not us, obvs.
So that’s 17,636 deaths and probably between 1 & 2 million adverse reactions in the UK, USA & Europe! What!!! Why the FUCK are we still using these abominations. This has got to be a crime against humanity and the perpetrators made to suffer for their evil. Also Tucker pointed out the other day some incredible statistic about there being more deaths from vaccines in The States in the last 4 months than in the last 15 1/2 years. Yet the hateful MSM are still insisting we take the experimental gene therapy and give it to children – yeah right! EVIL EVIL EVIL!!!
Why is it that the same community that (quite rightly) emphasises the distinction between dying with Covid and dying from Covid does not distinguish between dying with a vaccine and dying from a vaccine?
Define “with a vaccine”? Not that any of these are vaccines of course.
“With a vaccine” means that the incident happened shortly after being vaccinated.
Let’s say that almost all the reported miscarriages occurred within 48 hours of receiving vaccine but very few were reported more than a week after.
Would that be just coincidence?
No but it would not mean the vaccines were causing the miscarriages. The key word is “reported”. A much more relevant statistic would be are pregnant women who have recently been vaccinated more likely to have a miscarriage than pregnant women of the same demographic etc who have not been vaccinated.
I’m not sure what you mean by the key word is reported. Are you suggesting these miscarriages didn’t take happen.
There is clearly an anomalous spike. If miscarriages had nothing to do with the vaccine then they would be randomly distributed over a defined period (e.g. 50 days) so we’d expect 2% of the total each day – not 25% in one day.
The shorter the time between a vaccination and miscarriage the more likely people are to associate the two and report it. This is independent of the actual frequency of miscarriages. Imagine: If you were a woman who had the vaccine yesterday and quite possibly was still suffering some of the recognised mild after affects and you had a miscarriage – you would quite understandably think it was no coincidence (although it was). Two weeks later, all after effects gone, many other relevant things have happened, and you have a miscarriage. You are much less likely to connect the two.
Point taken, but as the brilliant article in leftlockdownsceptics (as recommended by baboon above) points out only 10% of serious adverse reactions and 1-3% of not so serious adverse reactions are reported. That’s an awful lot of under reporting so whatever preposition you put in front of Covid it needs looking into.
Epi thanks for suggesting the article. I didn’t see anything new in it, but it handily summarises the standard arguments with a extra enthusiasm. I have bookmarked it for future reference. As I have pointed out a couple of times before, the “10% of serious adverse reactions and 1-3% of not so serious adverse reactions” is a quote from an MHRA document in 2019 as part of a campaign to increase reporting following the low reporting of reactions in 2018. Given the hype round Covid vaccines there is no reason to suppose this estimate applies to Covid vaccine reports. One point arising from the article. It refers to “ a range of cheap, safe, and effective pharmaceuticals (Vitamin D, Ivermectin, doxycycline, zinc, etc”. I not against using these where they have been proven to be effective and I don’t understand why Invermectin has not been approved by the WHO. However, all pharmaceuticals have side effects. Here is the list for Ivermectin: “abnormal sensation in eye; anaemia; appetite decreased; asthenia; asthma exacerbated; chest discomfort; coma; confusion; conjunctival haemorrhage; constipation; diarrhoea; difficulty standing; difficulty walking; dizziness; drowsiness; dyspnoea; encephalopathy; eosinophilia; eye inflammation; faecal incontinence; fever; gastrointestinal discomfort; headache; hepatitis; hypotension; joint disorders; leucopenia; lymphatic abnormalities; Mazzotti reaction aggravated; myalgia; nausea; oedema; pain; psychiatric disorder; seizure; severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs); stupor; tachycardia; tremor; urinary incontinence; vertigo; vomiting You can imagine how if Ivermectin had the publicity that the vaccines have had and 39 million… Read more »
The point is we have 30 years of hard data on Ivermectin. Nearly 4 billion doses have been administered and, according to Paul Marek, just 16 deaths have been reported.
If there was any “over-reporting” of Ivermectin adverse events it would be clearly evident.
I have to say I find your attitude slightly puzzling. You seem to be suggesting that we carry on vaccinating (including children) unless it can be statistically ‘proven’ that the vaccine is causing the adverse events.
NO! You have it the wrong way round. We should STOP vaccinations until it can be shown with high statistical confidence that the vaccinations DON’T cause the severe adverse events,
The risks need to properly assessed so the public can make an informed choice. That isn’t happening.
I challenge that the risks are not being properly assessed. The vaccines we use have all been through RCTs. All the major agencies charged with vaccine safety are monitoring the hundreds of millions of doses that have been given so far. There has been a mountain of formal research – I entered Covid Vaccine Safety into Science Direct database and got 4,117 papers. Clearly I couldn’t look at them all, but the first ten had discovered no significant safety problems. If any had discovered a significant safety issue then I am sure it would hit the headlines, as it did for the minute risk of CVTs.
As against this we have anecdotes and concerns over the numbers of reports on self-reporting databases.
Pfizer Phase III Trial.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728?term=pfizer&cond=covid-19&draw=2&rank=2
Astrazeneca Phase III Trial
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04516746
The Trials only began in Late summer. They are/were not due to be completed until 2023. Several sections of the population were excluded from the trials, e.g. pregnant women. The UK began mass vaccination using a new technology on December 8th.
They vaccines have not been fully tested for safety. .
Yes I understand that phase 3 continues until 2023. But a major part of each has been completed. They comprised double blind randomised placebo controlled trials i.e. the absolute gold standard and the results showed no significant safety issues.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32661-1/fulltext
The situation with pregnant women is of course being monitored:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
Can you really compare these systematic controlled trials with reports from a self-reporting database?
And they need to prove that there is a real benefit compared with the alternatives, including nothing at all, in view of the risks to any individual.
The evidence is growing stronger that the vast majority of adverse events are associated with the vaccine.
Dr Jessica Ross analysed VAERS data by event type. She used the number of days between the onset of event and the vaccination date. There was a highly significant temporal signal.
I, as an observer, have been genuinely shocked at the number and severity of side effects reported by people I know.
Although all have ‘recovered’, these indicate a level of unwanted response to treatment that is very worrying by any normal standards of mass use.
100% of covid-jabbed people have clotting.
Some have undetectable issues but most have issues with it (women seem to have menstrual dysregulation!) which may not bode well for future fertility.
100% of covid-jabbed people have clotting.
Are you sure you meant that? That would mean 39 million people with blood clots and the NHS would truly be overwhelmed.
Can you give a reference? A “highly significant temporal signal” could mean almost anything.
I’m trying to locate the paper but there is a video by Jessica Stone which explains her method and findings. See link (about 20 mins in)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UODpC2znALf7/
I think I found the right bit of the video. It seems to be open to precisely the objection I raised here. The shorter the time between two events the more likely we are to think they are causally linked, even though that may not be justified.
The shorter the time between two events the more likely we are to think they are causally linked So they shouldn’t be investigated and we should carry on vaccinating pregnant women. This is the Pfizer Trial protocol (Nov 2020) https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf Now scroll down to Page 67 Section 8.3.5.1. Pfizer states that the Exposure During Pregnancy (EDP) should be reported to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours. 8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if: •A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure.Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy: •A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception. So EDP can simply mean… Read more »
Well there are some studies:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
It was a period of 15.5 years, not the last 15.5 years. I can only assume more recent data might not have been to hand.
Still an incredible stat.
Ellie Peacock was in Australia not the UK.
There is no mention of vaccines in the Suzanne Stokes story.
Those pushing the experimental gene therapies, masquerading as a v a c c i n e, should be prosecuted and considered complicit in ‘crimes against humanity’. And I don’t care what their social or economic status is.
(Replaced this post with reply to first post above)
The UN guide on covid-19 communication, linked to here, really does say on page 26 that people objecting to vaccines “have read the primary literature themselves, and they’re correctly interpreting it, so it’s not a misunderstanding”. Then there’s this: “They have other concerns that go beyond the traditional public health message of, ‘This is what you should be doing’.” First link on the list here:
https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3894424?ln=en
Is there any breakdown of the post-vaccine deaths into age ranges and/or comorbidites?
“we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine”
Nor am I in that absolute sense – these are terms used by unscientific tossers.
My opposition to take these ‘vaccines’ is based on one simple fact :
They cannot be declared ‘safe; within reasonable margins. The testing regime is a farce in accepted terms, and further doubt has been added by the actuality of side-effects, which are way outside normal expectations.
In terms of circumstantial reasoning – Who would swallow a medication based on a recommendation from proven liars about many issues around this non-epidemic, acting as a PR agency for big financial interests?
It really is a ‘no-brainer’.
I really hate this “vaccine” debate. If I had to go to a country tomorrow that had a Yellow Fever problem, would I take a Yellow Fever vaccine? Of course.
Will I take a “vaccine” for a disease I have a 99.98% chance of surviving, that I know doesn’t confer immunity and that has a high chance of causing my life to be a misery? No.
It is the moral and legal duty of every medic to speak out and openly and not to do so anonymously. Information on the quiet is ignored and makes little difference and we the general public cannot do anything about this. Given that “they” know these vaccines are causing harm to quite a few and yet continue, is no less than intentional maiming and killing and last time I checked these were crimes. More horrifying is that they are coming for the young and even pregnant women. Most have a brain and can look up this information very easily themselves and Dr Vernon Coleman has been providing weekly updates on deaths and adverse reactions for many months now. Some will have seen a recent interview with Prof Luc Montagnier who said these vaccines should not be used they are creating harmful variants and every Govt Scientist knows this so why are they doing it exactly? It was was also said (if a genuine interview of course) that the harm cannot be rectified for those who are now injected and there may be many deaths due to antibody dependent enhancement within the next couple of years. Time will tell but you… Read more »
Enough evidence is out there now to know that these experimental gene therapies are killing and injuring people. To say and to do nothing, can now be regarded as being complicit in ‘crimes against humanity’. And in particular for those within the medical and pharmaceutical professions.
Anyone see this zerohedge article? Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx’d | ZeroHedge It looks like the CDC are having to change their criteria of what constitutes a ‘case’. Of course it is the vaxxed people that will have a harder time registering a case. Why would they do this? The only reason is big pharma dont want you to know that the vaccines dont work. We have see the claimed efficacy of these vaccines falling over time as people get to test them in the real world as opposed to the manufacturers claims. It would appear that the real figures must be worrying, hence the change of criteria for recording a case. My guess is that the real efficacy of these vaccines is zero at best. I cant see how a single spike protein is going to fool the immune system to be primed for Covid. Worse, there is plenty of evidence that the vaccine leaves you MORE susceptible to Covid. That leaves a set of dangerous vaccines that dont protect you against anything. There appear to be a lot of Doctors and researchers sniffing out the real facts about what… Read more »
So – let’s extend this a little further :
The task is to create a greater ‘vaccine’ uptake by encouraging stupidity – because blithely accepting the vaccine is an act of lack of education and understanding.
Right. Got it.
Apologies to A.A. Milne
When some of the people
Got weezles and sneezles
They trundled us
Int’ our abodes.
They denied us what works
If you treat it at first
And disparaged the docs
Who opposed.
They wondered if lies
Could deceive all or eyes
If repeated, could turn us
To chumps.
They sent Not for doctors
in virology or immunology,
To tell them what ought
To be done.
All sorts and conditions
Of third-rate statisticians
Came hurrying round
At a run.
All made the same note
And continue to gloat
Not caring who suffers from harm.
They asked if the masks,
Social distance and tests
Had managed to turn us
To bots.
Then trot’d out the variants
Which merely are scariants
Thinking to further
The shots!
They expounded the reasons
For vaccines by seasons
The manner of tracking
And trace.
They said, “If ‘nough of the people
Can be turned into sheeple
We’ll be ruling
The whole human race!
Boris et alia
Get up in the morning
The virus has vanished away.
But the look in their eye
Seems to say to the sky,
“Now, how to abuse them today?”
I have a friend early to mid 50’s fit, active and healthy who had his first Jib-ab back in mid-March. In mid-April he noticed a problem with his face, ‘collapsing’, eye drooping on one side and some other symptoms which at first and understandably assumed to be a mini-stroke. He went to see a doctor. As you would. He was diagnosed soon after as having Bell’s Palsy. A very rare and scary affliction. It occurred to me that this might be a bit of a jib-jab coincidence…? So I asked whether he had wondered the same thing. His response? “It certainly crossed my mind as a possible side effect but the two events were 5 weeks apart. Still, a possible link, but not so likely I feel. Maybe I should look into it… 2nd jab next week, there’s always the other side!!!!“ He also wondered: “Should I report it under the yellow card? Maybe I should look into it” Is this what propaganda and brainwashing have done to sensible people? This person is to all intents and purposes an extremely professional, intelligent man for goodness sake, in charge of the finances of a medium-sized business. Is it just me? Bells… Read more »
Yesterday a 39 year old English woman died following a likely reaction to having the AZ vaccine(The only one available in Cyprus ,where she was working) with haematological and cerebrovascular problems. It is quite appalling that we seem to have a society that not only has been persuaded the young initially that they “are killing granny” by behaving normally but now they should risk their lives how ever low that risk; because they may transmit a virus, which may then mutate, and may be vaccine resistant, which then may get to granny ,who may then have the worst possible outcome being the one in 20 that dies if 80. This is total and utter madness. Jeremy Hunt should perhaps take time to speak to this families parents and explain how the vaccine was of benefit to her and stop telling us to vaccinate the young.. Face book have also tried to take down support of family and friends as the 39 year old lady narrated her difficulties on the social media. On this Lockdown Sceptics site there is in general an agreement ;but how do we together stop this lack of common sense? Carl Hennigan and Sunetra Gupta have seen… Read more »
Just had a chat with my mother who will do anything for Johnson. I quoted the VAERS figures and Yellow card system, she said its all rubbish and to stop reading up on it. All the while watching the BBC!