Britain’s medicines regulator has received reports from almost 4,000 women, mostly aged between 30 and 49, who have suffered period problems after taking a Covid vaccine. Reports were gathered until the middle of May – before the vaccine rollout opened for the whole adult population – so more up-to-date figures could show a much lower age range for period problems. The Sunday Times has the story.
Official data, obtained by the Sunday Times, show that the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) received 2,734 reports of period problems linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine, 1,158 related to the Pfizer jab, and 66 linked to the Moderna vaccine up to May 17th.
The issue, typically involving “heavier than usual” bleeding, could have affected many more women who would not have thought to report their experience. The majority of issues were reported in women aged between 30 and 49.
Asked why the problems had not been added to the official list of possible side effects of the Covid vaccines, the MHRA said a review with experts had found that there was no need to do so. The “current evidence” did not suggest an “increased risk” of period problems after the jab, it said, but it had published information on reports of menstrual disorders in its weekly report on adverse reactions.
Victoria Male, a Reproductive Immunologist at Imperial College London, said more women were likely to have been affected than the number of case reports. “It’s definitely true that not everyone will be reporting any menstrual changes they have noticed to Yellow Card [the MHRA’s scheme for people to report suspected side effects] simply because not everyone knows that it exists and that they can file a report,” she said.
Although a clear link between the Covid jab and menstrual disorders had not been established, “lots of people have contacted me to tell me about changes that they have noticed in their periods following vaccination”, Male said. “The kinds of things they are telling me about, mostly periods that are heavier or later than usual, are very similar to the reports we are seeing in Yellow Card.”
Angharad Planells, 34, from Cheltenham, said her period had been 11 days late after her second dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine. “My whole life I’ve been pretty regular and I track my period on an app. It was super late,” she said. “When it did start, it was one of – if not the – most painful periods I’ve ever had, to the point where I felt a bit nauseous.”
Planells, who reported the suspected adverse reaction to the MHRA, added: “I would still have the vaccine again. I have had family members die from Covid. It’s just the lack of information out there.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Asked why the problems had not been added to the official list of possible side effects of the Covid vaccines, the MHRA said a review with experts had found that there was no need to do so.
Clearly, the MHRA is either not doing their job or they are downright dishonest. Someone needs to start holding them to account. LDS could make a start.
LDS are borderline terrified of being branded antivax conspiracy nuts. The danger of these Nonsterilising innoculations has been skimmed over unfortunately. This is a matter of life and death, potentially worse than the lockdowns themselves.
LDS are borderline terrified of being branded antivax conspiracy nuts.
Yes, there’s the rub. But journalists should do their job, or they’re not journalists.
The main story in this Sunday Times article is that the MHRA is not doing its job.
The secondary story is that neither are journalists.
The period problems we all knew about weeks or even months ago.
“Period problems” or another way to describe it is “early onset menopause”.
I think a lot of the heavy flow is just fertile women showing what my mother called “thinner blood”. I wonder whether some people bleed more heavily from cuts after the jabs?
The equally important main story is that these jabs have widespread effects on the body. I assume the heavy flow indicates a drop in platelet counts happening immediately after vaccination and persisting, probably for different periods in different people.
Or sloughing off the uterus lining. The spike protein has haematological effects in the body, with various harmful effects.
Bret Weinstein’s discussion with Dr Malone on YT highlighted a Japanese study that said vaccine-generated spike proteins disperse throughout the body, but concentrate in the ovaries (obviously in women). I don’t know if that episode of the Dark Horse podcast is still up. YT doesn’t like the way these scientists have the temerity to discuss things they have professional experience in. His interview with Dr Pierre Kory about Ivermectin has already been taken down, although I think copies are being posted on the free media channels.
The Fourth Estate has largely sold itself to, or been bought by, Government. The hundreds of millions of pounds of public money being spent on Government advertising, and not just Covid-related, have, in the words of Nye Bevan re doctors, “stuffed their mouths with gold”. Of which, oddly, the same could be said of sections of the medical profession today.
Journalists usually work for editors, or, if freelance, are commissioned by editors. With the allure of all this money, which for some of the media is the transfusion now keeping them alive, if only in the sort term, there are very few people who will turn it down.
The BBC, of course, carries on bootlicking in hopes that it will get away with past sins, and avoid any future curtailments. With the “talk tough, act weak” Vicars of Bray now running the country, any meaningful sanctions on the BBC are an unlikely prospect.
I seem to remember a story about a local newspaper who said they were as independent as their budget allows. Newspapers are not charities. And charities can’t be relied on either. Cancer Research is funded by pharmaceutical companies seeking a profit.
You’re right, but LDS and, for instance, The Telegraph’s Planet Normal podcast are trying to walk a fine line between gaining mainstream readers / listeners and sadly being branded ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ (even if based on fact!). We haven’t got the stomach (again, sadly) for the James Dellingpoles of this world. Even Toby!!!
I have a post below highlighting a very informative podcast from Darkhorse Podcasts discussing the empirical dangers of the vaccine. Although they don’t allude to ‘sterilisation’, they do highlight the fact that a lot of the spike protein is settling in the ovaries …
Should change the M for medical to P for political.
PHRA, the noise a posh person makes when they get a sinecure from Boris.
LDS could make a start And even if it did so today it would be at least 5 month late, given the writing was on the wall from the moment the impact (both from vaxx side effects and the lowered immunity in the aftermath of the vaxx causing a surge in ‘C19 Deaths’ [sic] ) started becoming clear following the vaxx roll in December . LDS sat on the fence, and continues to sit on the fence with its idiotic ‘LDS is neither pro nor anti vaccine’ policy stance, assuming all its readers would fail to realise ‘lockdown’ & ‘vaxx policy’ are one and the same thing, and have been since at least March 2020. LDS takes its orders from its chums in government, as such it is controlled State opposition. It has become a salve for Tory voters who cannot face the fact their party is happily overseeing the biggest suspension of civil rights and liberties since WW2 (including mass illegal experimental gene therapy vaccinations without full informed consent), except without any existential justification. Indeed it is not a foreign power but the UK government that has declared war on its own people, coercing them (not hard) into being… Read more »
That neither for or against is largely throat clearing so they keep a platform. They are now publishing links and news which go against the narrative. Like Berenson, Young knows his on line position is precarious. If anyone is doing anything, we should applaud their resolution and courage.
So, at a time when we need the highest standards of investigative journalism to counter the insane taxpayer funded government and BBC propaganda machine we should put up with anything that looks vaguely sceptical. It’s no the wonder the UK is going down the pan.
“review with experts” receiving grant money from people heavily invested in the spread of these experimental “vaccines”.
I think dishonesty is the right conclusion
We know for a fact MHRA aren’t doing their jobs – they managed not to see the issues with the AZ jabs until half of Europe had, and then suddenly “Oh yeah”
(1) Informed consent and reproductive toxicity of vaccines (Robert Malone, Steve Kirsch, Bret Weinstein) – YouTube
Any connection?
Really worth a look – thanks.
Yes, I have watched this. The topic is indeed very well discussed and careful in drawing conclusions. I would not have expected that over 3 hours of quite rich science would have been so easy to watch.
Unfortunately, I found that episode hard going because of Steve Kirsch, although ultimately it is worth hearing in full.
You have to make allowances for Kirsch, He took the vaccine and so did his daughters before he realised what they truly were. He is angry and worried.
Where do I go to see all of this?
Dark Horse Podcast 11the June: How to save the world in three easy steps.(if it hasn’t been taken down by YT; they’ve had issues in the last couple of days)
Bret Weinstein on Bitchute
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/687Wb5rMdpw4/
HOW TO SAVE THE WORLD (3 HOUR VERSION)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/-_NNTVJzqtY/
HOW TO SAVE THE WORLD (ONE HOUR VERSION- with the annoying twat edited out to a minimum )
https://www.bitchute.com/video/myf5ZKLLRSVf/
And still want to have the vaccine so you can have your holidays abroad?
The spike protein is a very dangerous toxin that is generated for the vaccine, and is responsible for the entirety of the side effects that have been reported in this article, and more.
For a recent reference, see the interview to Dr. Byram Bridle, Professor of Viral Immunology
https://thewhiterose.uk/dr-byram-bridle-professor-of-viral-immunology-the-spike-protein-in-the-covid-vaccines-is-a-very-dangerous-toxin/?
Spike protein collects in ovaries and bone marrow according to Pfizer data from Japan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb_7E12VDE4
Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology.
Mr. Steve Kirsch is a serial entrepreneur who has been researching adverse reactions to COVID vaccines.
I am sure Robert Malone is an excellent scientist but a little context is in order. He has not worked on mRNA vaccines since publishing a paper 2000 and only got as far as vaccinating mice.
Robert Malone wrote to the FDA to warn them about the possible risks with using the spike protein as the target antigen. He didn’t need to do any further research for him to know this was a risk. The spike protein, on its own, causes disease. Whether or not he knew than in 2000 or 2010 or last year is irrelevant. He understood the mechanism of the vaccine and understood the risk.
Of course, if you can link to more recent papers which show that the spike protein is definitely not a problem then fine – we can ignore Malone’s warnings.
Thank you for accepting his past experience with mRNA is irrelevant (after all that is just how the spike protein gets there).
As far as the supposed problems with the spike protein are concerned please read this. I am not sure what kind of paper you would expect other the results of the many clinical trials and observational studies of the vaccines.
Thank you for accepting his past experience with mRNA is irrelevant
Not what I said. I said
Whether or not he knew than in 2000 or 2010 or last year is irrelevant.
In other words if he knew it 2000 then it’s still true to-day. Sorry if this is a bit tricky for you.
I’ve read it – response below. Blood clotting and heart problems are appearing more frequently. Watch Steve Kirsch’s video presentation on VAERS & CDC data (find him on Twitter).
The deaths are not random events.
By writing that the spike protein, on its own, causes disease you are entailing that mRNA experience is irrelevant. That spike protein could have got there by direct injection, adenovirus as in the case of AZ, or any other method. mRNA is just another method of generating it.
I am making it a rule not to follow up suggested readings or viewings without a link. I am fed up with spending a lot of time searching only to find I was looking at/reading the wrong thing. However, we have been over the debate over the value of the VAERS data before I am afraid I just can’t accept self-reporting incidents as evidence.
the delivery (or generation method) of the spike protein is important to where it ends up in the body
Link please.
Autopsies of mRNA injected people have found the spike and threads of rna in every part of the body. The adenovirus delivery method tends to show up earlier, hence the initial concerns just about AZ. But the mRNA is all pervasive, thats the ‘m’ bit in action, it never stops giving the message.
Link please. There is a lot of misinterpreted work out there.
Read it and did 3 mins of googling. Your link was to https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/byram-bridles-claim-that-covid-19-vaccines-are-toxic-fails-to-account-for-key-differences-between-the-spike-protein-produced-during-infection-and-vaccination-misrepresents-studies/ Scroll to the bottom and you will see that it is edited by a Iria Carballo-Carbajal Here is her bio on the website https://healthfeedback.org/editor/iria-carballo-carbajal/ Google her name and she appears to be editor here.. https://sciencefeedback.co/author/iria-carballo-carbajal/ Check who science feedback’s sponsors are – Facebook is number 1. * Then something climate based, and then a group called Ashoka Enter their name into the gates foundation grantee list, and whaddayaknow but Ashoka is on the list and got a cool 15 million dollars back in 2006, presumably to set it up. https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=Ashoka Click their about section and you find that science feedback and health feedback are the same entity and that moreover, science feedback is working in partnership with the WHO https://sciencefeedback.co/about/ “ Health Feedback is a member of the World Health Organization’s Vaccine Safety Net, a network of websites that provide reliable information on vaccine safety.” They also are basically sponsored by Facebook to work alongside them censoring content. Moreover they are at the forefront of terrorising people about climate change. So actually their analysis is worth jack shit, (to coin a phrase). Back to your parliamentary research… Read more »
Good Work.
Researching the backgrounds of these so-called independent individuals is definitely a good way of exposing the inter-linking webs of control and influence.
Time consuming and depressing when you realise how deep this goes.
The new Bolsheviks are pursuing their long hoped for agenda, with the useful idiots eagerly doing the leg work.
Nicely researched
Good reason to jab young girls.
Makes me glad I don’t have ovaries any more (cancer many years ago). But yes, wonderful thing to do to young girls, or any woman capable of reproduction who might actually want to use that capability.
Read this response
The first three paragraphs summarise it.
Unsupported: Findings from recent studies suggested that the spike protein from the virus that causes COVID-19 might damage blood vessels, but data are still preliminary. The effect of spike protein in infected animals can’t be extrapolated to vaccine-derived spike protein in humans.
Misrepresents source: None of the studies reported harmful effects from spike protein produced by COVID-19 vaccination. On the contrary, one study suggested that COVID-19 vaccines targeting the spike protein might prevent blood vessel damage.
Lack of context: The spike protein produced by COVID-19 vaccination behaves differently from spike protein produced during infection. While some spike protein produced through vaccination might enter the bloodstream, it is at a much lower level compared to the amount associated with damage in infected animals.
You don’t get it do you? We should not be waiting to find out whether or not the spike proteins damage blood vessels
The vaccines rollout should be STOPPED until it can be proved conclusively that they DON’T cause damage to blood vessels. .
This is all a**e about face. The onus should not be on those claiming that there is a potential risk, it should be on those who are advocating mass vaccination to show that there definitely isn’t a risk.
That is the spike protein from the virus. The point is it is not even proven that it is the spike protein which causes the virus to damage blood vessels. If you go on to read the article you will see that:
I.e. there is no reason to suppose that the vaccine created spike protein damages blood vessels. You could of course go on investigating every idea about possible side effects to the nth degree and no vaccine or pharmaceutical would ever get to be used. Meanwhile all the current vaccines have been through RCTs and have been given to millions of people under close observation. If they are harmful it is either very long term or a very small effect indeed.
The Japanese-revealed rodent studies show it doesn’t stay in the site.
We aren’t rodents! But could you provide a link so we can all see what the study actually did?
The Japs have rodents who carry out studies???. Do the rodents spend their days poring over books in the University libraries?
Is a ‘revealed rodent’ a rodent who was in the closet previously?
Why are the unrevealed rodents not allowed to take part?
Smacks of discrimination
Unrevealed rodent lives matter
As said, your reasoning about this is a-about-t. As usual
The whole point of an adequate testing regime is to establish within reasonable probability limits the safety of a medical intervention.
That can’t be done in the present framework.
Nothing more needs to be said.
No link. No causal link. No established causal link. A clear link has not been established. We know how they operate. And I think we can see how you operate.
Yes it is completely harmless and that’s why we are having unprecedented vaccine-related deaths and injuries.
Proof of the pudding…
Monica – what we have is more than usual reports on self-reporting systems such as VAERS. It is a big jump from that to concluding that there are actually unprecedent deaths and injuries. Meanwhile proper scientific observational studies based on over a billion doses round the world are showing just a couple of extremely rare side effects.
Bollox… if you think I believe that “proper scientific observational studies on over a billion doses are showing a couple of rare side effect”….. what tosh.
You’ve blown any cred with that statement.
I little more detail might add to your case!
VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 358,379 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 5,993 deaths and 29,871 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and June 11, 2021.
Just a couple of extremely rare side effects?
The USA has vaccinated 176 million people. About 1% of people die every year – vaccine or no vaccine. You would expect about 880,000 of 176 million people to die every six months. So the fact that 5,993 happened to have died has no statistical significance unless you can show that they died because of the vaccine. It is the job of the FDA/CDC to investigate reported deaths to check whether they might have been caused by the vaccine. And indeed they have picked up a very few cases (blood clots) where a link is suspected which shows they are doing their job.
Why even take the vaccine route if cheap alternatives like Ivermectin etc proved more effective and have no long term effects? Vaccine safety takes years to prove. Think Thalidomide. This is malpractice
The chief advantage of a vaccine over a drug is that you only need take one or two doses and you have protection for a long period. We don’t yet know how long the current vaccines last but it is looking good so far – so at least six months. Once you have got over any immediate side effects then the process doesn’t involve any further intervention into your metabolism. It just relies on your natural immune system.
Using a drug like Ivermectin as a prophylactic would mean taking it continually. This would mean continually interfering with your metabolism. Although Ivermectin has been used as a prophylatic against parasites in Africa, there have been reports of side effects (there is no equivalent to VAERS or the yellow card system) and no long term safety review!
Perhaps we should give up all interventions for fear of long term effects? You never know.
(Thalidomide involved women taking regular doses over several months)
And how do you know that these so-called ‘vaccinations’ won’t harm our natural immune systems? What long-term studies can you point to?
We can never be certain of anything in life. Of course there aren’t any studies longer than the year or so since the phase 3 trials began. Nor are they any long term studies on the effects of getting Covid or taking Ivermectin as a prophylactic. How do you know neither of these will harm our natural immune system? Meanwhile, someone has got to decide which is the best route to take.
In the end you have to decide how long you are prepared to wait before using any intervention. The longer the more certain you are that it is safe but the more people will miss out on the protection. One year, five years, twenty years? There is no magic number.
Ivermectin has been in use for decades, with billions of doses prescribed and taken. The side effects are well known.
The CV19 vaccines have been in use for a matter of months. The number of side effects are numerous, and just a fraction will be officially recorded as people are convinced the vaccine is safe and therefore can’t be responsible, or are unaware of the reporting system.
Ivermectin has not been used as a prophylactic until recently and where it has been used there has been little or no attempt to record side effects. ( Prophylactic use means taking a dose regularly over weeks or months as opposed to a one off regime of a few days.)
I’ll leave those more knowledgeable than me to debate the technicalities.
The fact is, mass vaccination for a virus that is only dangerous to a tiny fraction of people and a clear age gradient is insane.
That’s unless of course you stand to benefit from the insanity, which is of course what this is all about.
And for you to claim that the vaccine gives “protection for a long period” is either a deliberate lie or you’re frighteningly ignorant.
The vaccines offer zero guarantee of protection and even the disgraceful politicians have been forced to concede this.
Actually, he said they were only effective for 6 months! Great, a whole 6 months then you will continually need booster shots which MTF did not mention so, yeah, wouldn’t that mess with your metabolism???
I said – at least 6 months (because that’s how long they have been in general use – the clinical trials probably show it is longer) and it is looking good so far. Who knows how long the effect will actually last. But there is no reason to suppose it will be shorter than natural immunity as it is essentially the same process.
Then why the need for booster shots if it lasts as long as natural immunity? Natural immunity, according to studies, would be 17 years. That also raises the question – why vaccinate people who have natural immunity???
We don’t actually know how long natural immunity will last – but the case for booster shots as I understand it is to address new variants – like we get a flu shot every year.
Natural infection exposes the immune system to all epitopes of the virus.
Experimental vaccination exposes the body to the spike protein only.
It follows that the immunity from natural infection must be more wide ranging and longer lasting than from experimental vaccination especially in the light of S gene mutations.
Encountering the virus naturally for example through entry into the nasal passages, is the way that our immune system has evolved to come across viruses and so is likely to create the best most appropriate immune response. Transfection on the other hand, which is how most of the experimental vaccines work, is experimental and the long term affects can’t be known.
People infected with SarsCov-1 had natural immunity seventeen years later. Hard to beat I think.
Well that bodes well for the vaccines – great.
Why is anyone wasting their time replying to this MTF person –
The chief advantage of acquiring natural immunity over an experimental gene therapy is you only need to ‘get it’ once, thus achieving a far superior multifaceted form of defense that these jabs could only dream of delivering, lasting, I don’t know, 17 years + which I guess is otherwise known as for-fucking-ages-so-fuck-off-with-your-snake-oil.
This episode in the history of virology would have been over in June 2020 with far less loss of life than we have to date (the virus being the least of it), with God knows what in the pipeline.
MTF going ATM for Big Pharma?
I don’t think there is any reason for supposing natural immunity would last longer than vaccine immunity. After all they work by roughly the same method.
The chief disadvantage of natural immunity is that means getting the disease. I am not aware of any review of the long term safety issues of getting Covid!
Boosters, anyone? At least I can take refuge that you’re not an immunologist that doesn’t know what they’re talking about. The problem is our CSO and CMO do know what they’re talking about and are spouting lies. Why? The government aren’t aware of the long term safety issues of lockdowns, mask wearing or vaccinating an entire population with an ill-tested potion – but for some obscure reason they, along with practically every other nation on earth, decided that this moderate flu was a fantastic reason to throw out their very expensive pre-pandemic preparedness plans (which we paid for) and fuck with our inalienable rights, a mere few days after downgrading Covid-19 from being classified as a high consequence disease. They didn’t seem to care too much previously about the long term safety issues of catching a cold or the flu. They certainly didn’t give the month of January 2018 a second glance with over 70,000 excess deaths for that month alone. Why now? If you’re seriously suggesting that humanity should downgrade their immune systems at the mercy of vaccination for every ailment/illness known to man, I suggest that you do a little more research into the pharma industry – no… Read more »
The review is in the risk profile – if you are <60 years with none of the following co-morbidities (mostly related to insulin resistance): High blood pressure, diabetes/obesity, heart disease, kidney disease, Covid will be a non event for the vast majority.
If you have co-morbidities or you are in the upper age ranges, take the vaccine, it may (or may not) help. For the healthy population, why take a chance on an experimental treatment with unknown long term risks?
That doesn’t seem to encompass the 5 year safety trial some people are asking for for the vaccine.
Here is a twitter thread explaining science that indicates that ‘immunity acquired via infection is much broader than that triggered by current vaccines’
https://twitter.com/gerdosi/status/1400459537149153289
The vast majority of the world population will wait for at least another 6-12 months to get vaccinated, experimental or not. In the mean time millions will die because information on prophylaxis and early treatment is actively suppressed.
We do have some brains in the third world: we use Ivermectin when positive tests start creeping up, so 2 months on, three months off. It has a 40+ year safety record, what on earth do you want – a sign from God himself?
Pandemrix vaccinations ring any bells? And those had Phase 3 trials behind them.
The most damaging is the coercion regarding these vaccines. Especially considering people will need 6-12 monthly boosters.
Your logic is wrong. These are not just any old deaths that happened to occur within a 6 month period. These are deaths that people (including medics) believe occurred because of the “vaccine” (or at least that the vaccine was a contributing factor), presumably because they occurred within hours or days of the person being injected (and the death was unexpected), or that the person developed a serious and again unexpected set of symptoms within hours or days of the injection and never recovered but may have died weeks later. If these were all expected deaths, why the hell would anyone be vaccinating people literally on death’s door? That in itself would be highly unethical. But we know many were unexpected because of the stories families are now sharing of their deceased loved ones. Or do you think they are lying?
This is a very small proportion of the people who would have died anyway.
Given the hype round Covid and the vaxx programme (it has been described as a golden opportunity for the anti-vaxx movement) it is not surprising that a small proportion of those who would have died anyway were wrongly ascribed to the vaccine, particularly if the death occurred within hours or days of the vaccination. Nevertheless the regulatory agencies monitor and investigate reports of deaths.
It seems completely plausible that a small proportion of the people who would have died were not expected to die in the immediate future. My mother is 99 and still got vaccinated.
Please provide evidence that the regulatory agencies do any proper investigation into suspected covid vaccine deaths. Just because they say they do doesn’t mean they actually do it. The sisters interviewed on the UK Column regarding their father’s death (“good man down”) said that the MHRA weren’t remotely interested in doing any kind of investigation in their case, and I doubt that their experience was anything unusual.
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/a-good-man-down-the-fatal-reality-of-vaccine-adverse-reactions
They identified the risk of clots and myocarditis. It would be extraordinary if all the major regulatory agencies round the world decided to do a crap job simultaneously.
Yes that would be another one of those extraordinary coincidences that seem to be endemic in these times of covid! Sorry MTF, you either put way too much faith in these deeply corrupt organisations, or you are just one of their stooges. Whatever.
If you get a vaccine induced blood clot, you wouldn’t have died anyway would you? It’s a specific blood clot, VACCINE INDUCED.
The dozens of young people, particularly young men, currently suffering from VACCINE INDUCED myocarditis, wouldn’t have it without having had the vaccine.
But don’t let facts get in the way of your idiotic proclamations.
a) I don’t think that’s true. The clots are the same ones that occur naturally. (but it is late and I am too tired to look up the reference)
b) We know about clots and myocarditis and have accepted that there is small increased risk. So those particular deaths and symptoms are accounted for. They are a small proportion of reported deaths and injuries.
VITT (vaccine–induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia) is a very rare adverse event characterised by presence of blood clots with low levels of platelets following vaccinationwith the University of Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.19 May This is from the Governments own website.
The reason eighteen countries suspended the AZ vaccine is because it isn’t vaguely normal.
They’ve followed up a couple of conditions that couldn’t be ignored, because they were too unusual. There may well be many other adverse effects that are not showing up, we don’t know and we may never know now because the control groups on the Phase III trials have been in effect shut down after just 6 months. Deploying a treatment to millions of people, and following up the odd case that can’t be ignored, is not at all the same thing as performing a clinical trial with a control group. Once a treatment is rolled out, above-background incidence of serious adverse effects can take years to be spotted, if it ever is.
There conditions that couldn’t be ignored are of the order of 5 per million. So how uncommon would any condition be that was rare enough to be ignored?
What makes you think the phase III trials have been shut down?
As I understand it the control groups in the original trials have been offered the experimental vaccine and most have taken it. So there is no longer any randomly selected vaccine/control group comparison available to assess long term affects.
Essentially it is reasonable to consider this development as shutting down the phase 3 trials.
Worryingly neither the vaccine induced blood clots, or the vaccine induced myocarditis were found during the so called ‘rigorous trials’.
Yes they are very uncommon.
Nope. Please see my reply above. Not common at all.
That was in the wrong place.
“About 1% of people die every year…” Exactly. So dying of Covid is not any greater than dying from something else because there wasn’t really any excess deaths in 2020.
Just a heads up – The VAERS system has historically only represented between 1-10% of the total number of adverse effects, or death I guess.
5,993 deaths could very well be between 59,930 – 599,300 for all we know.
It’s rather handy that it’s been left to the recipients of vaccines, or next of kin to log their reactions, leaves it all speculative and ambiguous, just how politicians like it.
So, according to you, every single adverse vaccine reporting system in the world is wrong, currently not working, and totally irrelevant?
No. Not totally irrelevant. They do what they are supposed to do. Alert the relevant authority about possible problems. As they all emphasise, they are not suitable for deducing whether a vaccine is causing an adverse reaction.
For info on all side effects collated by MHRA Yellow Card go to:
https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports
Click Image to enlarge and read figures.
‘More than usual’ – that’s a very euphemistic way of describing more deaths reported in VAERS this year so far than for the previous 20 years. That alone is a signal worthy of consideration when giving novel gene therapy vaccines under emergency use authorisation to hundreds of millions of people.
As you must know, there are major differences between observational studies and RCTs. As you also must know, RCTs are the gold standard for clinical studies. The fact is that these vaccines are still in phase 3 trials, however, the RCTs in this case cannot even be completed as the control groups started to get the vaccines. Because of this, we may never know the long term effects, if any, of these vaccines. And regardless whether the Yelllow Card or VAERS systems are self reporting, which is not entirely true because physicians do report to these systems, the fact remains that there have been hundreds of thousands of reports in the UK, US, and Europe which is a complete anomaly when compared to the last 20 years of reporting. In 1976, the rollout of the vaccine for the Swine(?) flu was halted only after about 50 deaths were reported. In the US alone, there has been about 5,000 deaths reported, which may be less than actual. This has become so politicized that they will not halt this because if they do then they will look foolish and will have admitted that they just put millions of lives at risk. How… Read more »
Where is the evidence these are self reports? Are you saying thousands of doctors and medics are making it up? You’re always asking for evidence, what are these ‘proper scientific observational studies’ you blather about?
VAERS and yellow card do not record who submits the reports but the EMA equivalent – EudraVigilance – does. It shows that 75% of reports are not from medical professionals. It is quite complicated to get to the report so I attach the relevant screenshot for the AZ vaccine.
You can find a good list of scientific reports on the vaccines here.
Cheers
I suspect the 116 16-30 year olds now reported as suffering from myocarditis (VAERS) are not self reporting.
Hard to fill those cards out in the middle of a heart attack.
Your link did not lead to a ‘good list of scientific reports’; it lead to a page that read like marketing material written for children. Side effects – now well documented – barely mentioned. Embarrassing.
And how many medical professionals will have been instructed not to make reports?
PEG may have a role in this too.
Angharad Planells said, “I have had family members die from Covid.”
Can someone please tell her how incredibly unlikely it is to have just ONE family member die FROM Covid – never mind MORE THAN ONE?! The cognitive dissonance is strong with her…
you sound as if you have been brain washed!
that’s true after vaccination. That’s the point of it!
What, that people die after vaccination?
Yes, we know, that’s what we’ve been saying.
She meant “with” of course. Funny how careful people are meant to be with pronouns, but not prepositions.
My great uncle died last year at the age of 95. He had had and recovered from covid (its just a cold). Then died later that year of old age. Went down on the covid stats though
Of course it did!
If she is representative of the population, the average age of the people she knows who died with COVID will be 82.
“I would still have the vaccine again”.
Your wish will be granted because the boosters are on the way.
“Three weeks to flatten the curve” was just the start of the tsunami of lying.
Miscarriages? Still births? Infertility? Nah, let’s report on menstruation.
Of course they could all be connected.
It’s sterilzation in all forms. Men too. All going to plan it seems (data now confirming). Pure evil…
The men of Britain started menstruating long before the jab arrived
They were told, but took the jab anyway:
“It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.”
Show me the official NHS public information vaccine warning these women were given BEFORE taking the jab that clearly told them the vaccine could have an impact on fertility, and was not guaranteed to prevent contracting or transmitting Covid 19. And if these women were care home workers it would be a mandatory jab anyway. School kids next.
The Pig Dictators wife abusing dad says he wants to reduce the population of Britain to 15m
Fat Boy Son, Hancock, Zebedee, Buckland and others look like they may achieve OTE
Victoria Male.
Ideal name for one in her job.
Maybe she’ll change it to ‘Victorium Binary’.
Yes very woke
As Peter McCullough says, based on established practice these ‘vaccines’ would have been withdrawn by now; the Swine Flu vaccine was pulled when it had caused 200 deaths. The Covid vaccines have caused many thousands of deaths. Why haven’t they been withdrawn?
A question for all you vaccine doubters.
My son is participating in a clinical trial for a “conventional” vaccine based on a dead version of the virus. Assuming the RCTs show no safety issues will this be acceptable as it doesn’t use any scary new nRNA technology? Or are all vaccines unacceptable on principle?
Your son is as good as immune from covid. Why use him as a guinea pig?
That’s assuming he is under 65 years of age, of course
He kindly volunteered to help evaluate a vaccine which you might consider safer. No one is using him as a guinea pig.
As it happens, he is also being very considerate to me getting vaccinated. Vaccination greatly reduces your chances of getting it and therefore of passing it on – even for the young. I have multiple myeloma which means I will always have a heavily compromised immune system. It will make both of us more relaxed if we give each other a hug! This is not an unique situation.
has he not had any of the gene therapies on offer to kindly protect you?
Please see my reply to Monica.
If the vaccine is effective like a vaccine should be then you should be protected regardless of whether your son has one or not.
Why jeopardise your son’s health to protect yours?
I didn’t even know he was doing it until just before he took the first jab. He is 32. He can make his own decisions!
The vaccine is not 100% effective for anyone. The evidence so far is that it is even less effective for myeloma patients. I can’t even have a vaccine for a couple of months because recent treatment means my immune system would not respond.
“Vaccination greatly reduces your chances of getting it and therefore of passing it on”
What’s your evidence for this?
Just for the record, I’m not anti-vax and couldn’t care less what people want to inject into their bodies.
What I object to is needless mass vaccination which has nothing to do with public health and is being driven by Government propaganda and lies.
https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/feature/everything-you-need-to-know-about-covid-19-vaccines
This is one of the best selections I have seen of the mass of evidence for the effectiveness of the various vaccines.
Ah, a link collating info straight from Big Pharma about how effective the vaccines are.
No conflict there of course, apart from the fact that they are proven liars and stand to make billions out of mass vaccination in perpetuity.
You might scoff at this claim, so let’s start with good old Wikipedia to demonstrate how corrupt these organisations are:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_pharmaceutical_settlements
Asymptomatic spread driving the virus was a lie, a “novel” virus was a lie, everyone being susceptible was a lie, no natural immunity was a lie, Covid being untreatable was a lie, lockdowns being effective was a lie, masks being effective was a lie, social distancing was a lie…and so on.
Every aspect of this narrative has been a lie and the need for mass vaccination is the latest.
That’s an argumentum ad hominem.
Are the studies it links to invalid in some way? They look pretty solid to me.
Nope, it isn’t an ad hominem argument, its logic.
I can’t confirm validity or invalidity, how could I? All I have is a choice as to what is or isn’t a credible source.
Establishment health organisations and Big Pharma are proven liars, so I disregard the RPS as a credible source, especially as they are most likely politically and financially compromised (as the big banner advert from GSK indicates).
Show me anything published by the RPS arguing against mass vaccination or highlighting the dangers of adverse vaccine reactions.
Actually, just to add, if any of those studies “proved” Covid by virtue of a PCR test, then yes, I will invalidate them.
I’m amazed I missed the biggest porkie of all – the PCR test – in my list of lies above. Mind you, there’ve been so many now that i’m struggling to remember them all.
So he chose to volunteer to have the vaccine. That’s up to him. Some of us have chosen not to have the vaccines. Some have chosen to have the vaccines but will refuse the boosters. Choice is a basic human in matters such as these.
Basic human RIGHT that was meant to say. Remember those?
I agree. I would be against coercion.
Many of us on this site have family members who are aged or suffer from co-morbidities which put them at risk.
I have lived with an immune-compromised child for 18 years (transplant) and we have had to make choices – live life fully among the unwashed masses or hide under the bed. We have chosen to live fully and do not expect humanity to sacrifice their quality of life to protect my child from what is a normal microbiome: viruses, bacteria, fungi etc.
Just as your immune system is compromised, so are the wallets of millions of families across the globe due to this insane “protect me at all costs” mentality. Budgets have been slashed for non-Covid treatments/diseases, people don’t have work, their kids are starving and TB/Malaria/AIDS campaigns have been set back many years. Covid vaccines are the last thing we are worrying about.
So no, I am not going to be considerate to you. If my kid can suck it up and live life normally not expecting any favors – so can you.
I don’t think I did ask for any favours, did I? I was wasn’t talking about lockdowns – only vaccines.
My heart goes out to your child and you. Have you got yourselves vaccinated? It would add a small bit of additional protection for your child.
Great post, especially given your personal circumstances.
What I really like is that you clearly expose MTF and his ilk for what they really are – utterly selfish.
Can you explain what is selfish about my position? I believe vaccines are effective and safe. Perhaps I am wrong, but I don’t see why that is selfish.
I applaud Liewe’s choice of how to handle his child’s compromised immunity. It was a brave thing to do.
This is the problem. We’re talking about stuff injected into billions of people.
You believe it because you’ve been told that the peddlers of this potion ‘think’ it’s safe and effective. I prefer it when they indisputably ‘know’ but they don’t because:
a) It’s only been tested for 5 minutes in the grand scheme of things.
b) It was only trialed to reduce moderate symptoms – which makes Lemsip just as effective.
c) It’s been woefully under-tested on folk that have recovered from Covid-19.
They simply don’t know.
I demand that bystanders-at-the-switch leave it the hell alone at the best of times. I consider coerced pharmaceutical interventions at the worst of times an attack on humanity itself.
If I may, I suggest you invest in a better bullshit detector – mine’s in the red.
The devastating consequences of the last 16 months will continue to be felt for many years to come. If you supported any of it, especially on the basis that it was required until vaccines arrived, then you are selfish and gullible.
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt as you haven’t actually clarified your position on anything apart from vaccines (although I can’t help but assume you did support the measures taken).
But given that you “believe vaccines are effective and safe” then presumably you’re against mass vaccination? Otherwise why is this necessary once the old and vulnerable are jabbed?
I think your comment epitomises a couple of problems underlying this debate.
1) The assumption that anyone who disagrees is either stupid or wicked. Actually it is a very difficult situation with no precedent where people have to make very large decisions on a short timescale with incomplete information. Sure, make the case that they are wrong but don’t go after them personally.
2) The assumption that everyone is on one side or the other. A sort of tribalism takes over where everyone is either anti-lockdown/anti-mask/anti-vaccine etc or pro all of them. We all disappear into our echo chambers and confine our information to sources we “trust” i.e. sources that we agree with.
As it happens I am convinced the vaccines effective and safe, but unsure how effective lockdowns are and extremely uncertain as to whether they are a good idea. I changed my views on lockdowns as a result of reading stuff on this site.
The main problem underlying the debate is that there hasn’t been any debate, it’s been one-sided propaganda almost exclusively all the way through. 1) Just like most other countries, we had a pandemic preparedness plan, so why wasn’t it followed? The virus was downgraded to flu-level in March 2020, around the same time Vallance is on record saying the best approach would be focused protection and herd immunity. Why the U-turn? There was absolutely nothing in the data to warrant it and, even had this been the case, the very least you would expect is a cost/benefit analysis. So either they panicked and followed the herd which would make them stupid, or there was a hidden agenda which, given the stakes involved, cannot be anything other than wicked. 2) But we don’t need to rely on “sources” or models for what we believe works or doesn’t work, we have empirical evidence. Sweden, Japan, Florida, South Dakota, Texas, other southern US states and parts of Scandinavia – all show conclusive evidence that the “measures” had no effect, or perhaps worsened the situation. Yes, you’ve already given your views on vaccines. I just hope you’ll be back here in 3-4 months when… Read more »
I wouldn’t have a problem with one of the conventional vaccines in the pipeline. I don’t feel I need one, but if I was forced I would likely choose a conventional vaccine being tested by Lancaster Uni – its a nasal spray vaccine (effective against all spike protein mutations apparently) – but i wont be having any gene therapy that technically are not vaccines.
There is also research in Canada that may show the old BCG I had as a kid is effective against the virus, in all its forms – so I’m already vaxxed – oh, and I, like most people, have a healthy immune system – but there’s no money in that or promoting a healthy lifestyle.
A massive worry for me is that the gene therapy roll out will lead to normalising vax passports, leading to digital control IDs and we will need every damn medication big pharma and public health insanity dictates to live our lives – nightmare..
shame people are not more involved in trials for treatments like ivermectin – but then that wont lead to vax passports and huge ‘vaccine’ profits!
Although I’d be identified as an anti-vaxxer (I prefer the term vaccine skeptic), I’d view an attenuated virus administered via nasal spray quite favourably.
Firstly, it would be the real virus, so my immune system has the opportunity to recognise multiple bits of the virus, so providing better protection than a vaccince that leads to recognition of only one bit.
Secondly, infection via inhalation is the way the virus naturally spreads, so my immune system gets to run through all the stages it would for the real thing.
Personally though, I’m about 99% sure I’ve already had the real thing, so I’m quite happy I’m as immune as I’m going to get.
My experience of the nasal flu vaccine is that it mutates very fast and so actually created the “wild type” virus which triggers immune compromise in the vaccinated, and makes the unvaccinated sick.
The agent also is sprayed on your mucosa which are extremely close to your brain. Personally, I would avoid letting anyone do this to my brain, as it’s a very useful bio weapon, and given most vaccines are not manufactured in Britain, but assembled here, I’m not keen to spray something made in India/China and assembled in say Hertfordshire, up my nose.
My sentiments exactly.
I have nothing against TRIED AND TESTED vaccines for DANGEROUS diseases. These are neither, I’d prefer to rely on my ironclad immune system but suspect soon I will be compelled to take something (we all will) and a safer alternative would be better than the present incumbents
If it’s a traditional vaccine then that would be ok in principle provided the usual, thorough, testing procedures are followed and they aren’t being rushed to market and nobody is forced or pressured into taking them.
its just a cold. It doesn’t need a rushed out vaccine.
its the rushing I object to. 10-15 years would be appropriate for testing a new vaccine for mass roll-out – especially to children
most vaccine candidates fail in safety trials – I expect these would if we tested them long enough
it took 2 years for the RSV vaccine to start killing children
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respiratory_syncytial_virus_vaccine
Actually it was 9 months. You can read about it in this paper:
Kapikian, Albert Z et al. (1969) ‘AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY OF ALTERED CLINICAL REACTIVITY TO RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL (RS) VIRUS INFECTION IN CHILDREN PREVIOUSLY VACCINATED WITH AN INACTIVATED RS VIRUS VACCINE’, American journal of epidemiology, 89(4), pp. 405–421
I am afraid it is behind a paywall unless you have access to an academic library (which I am lucky enough to have).
Knock yourselves out
https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120954
Hmmm…one of those questions….odd
That last sentence is silly MTF
People aren’t against proven tried and tested vaccines, so please don’t try that line of reasoning. I bet all of us on this site have had our regular jabs. But this unhealthy push for a so-called vaccination against a virus equivalent to a bad flu? Where there appears to be a spike in deaths after a spate of vaccinations? Where people test positive for covid after having been vaccinated? Where there is this constant psychological pressure to be vaccinated, even from people such as yourself?
Alarm bells are clanging all over the place.
Greater love hath no man that he lays down his son for his life
lol
Yes, conventional vaccines would be more trustworthy, but will still need proper trials as Coronavirus vaccines have not been successfully developed for animals/humans.
Youngsters still don’t need them.Coercion will still be immoral.
The type of vaccine is irrelevant. The point is that these vaccines have been rushed to market and are being misrepresented as having the same level of evidence of being safe as a flu jab. That is simply not the case. There is a reason why 7-10 years is the typical period it takes to get a vaccine to the stage where it is felt to be safe enough of mass vaccination program.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/
All covid vaccines have traditionally caused pulmonary immunopathy when exposed to wild virus. Which is why the research was done so many years ago after SARS1 to establish the viable alternatives to vaccination (hydroxychloroqine emerged as a front runner in a study sponsored by NIAID under Tony Fauci). It simply isn’t possible to safely vaccinate against SARS. There will be mass casualties, (as indeed there have been). The mRNA/adenovector model was only used because some faulty assumptions were made, number one of which was that it would not enter the bloodstream. But it does, and when a human is exposed to the wild type virus it in fact cause coagulation. So it’s a bit of a lottery because if your son is wondering around with the vaccine antibodies in his bloodstream, then the potential for coagulation is great where the virus enters and attacks (lungs primarily). The antibodies will rush to his lungs and heart, triggering the “cytokine storm” we saw in the elderly during 2019/2020, and he’ll be extremely sick or die. It’s a bit of a contrast with the mRNA vaccine, as with the wild type virus, it’ll depend on where the site(s) are in your body that… Read more »
Don’t worry – my son is very much an adult – 32 and getting married next week. I was not at all involved in his decision to participate in the trial.
Could you provide some links as evidence for what you say?
I’m afraid that LDS is censoring me when I put links in my responses, so you’re getting my analysis without the links. But anyone interested can hunt them down themselves. As your son is more than capable of doing his own research and you’re not responsible for him, all I can do is wish him well.,
Did you mean to link to this paper? It is about a 2012 trial using animals where some possible vaccines (none of them mRNA of course) were dismissed because of problems i.e. the trial did what it was supposed to do.
You asked about a traditional vaccine. I supplied the reason why in dubious as to the safety.
All vaccines come with some risk.
So if you have negligible risk from covid itself as most do, then vaccination is not appropriate whether it’s traditional or not.
If a conventional innactivated or attenuated vaccine was developed and we had say 6 years of safety data to show it was relatively safe, and I had not already encountered the virus and I was in a group vulnerable to the virus then I would consider that vaccine if I assessed the benefits to me and others exceeded the potential harms from the vaccine.
Because the covid vaccines have become political in nature then that would influence my decision making also in this hypothetical situation.
You vaccinate against diseases to which you are at risk. You don’t coerce the entire population into taking an experimental gene-based medical intervention to prevent a disease which 99%+ of the population are not at risk from. I don’t think any of us find vaccines unacceptable on principle – we find this ‘vaccine’ unacceptable. I don’t care what delivery method is used – I don’t want my body to manufacture an unknowable number of virus proteins for an unknowable period of time. It’s completely insane.
Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccinations, has said that the Covid19 vaccinations are not safe, that the spike protein accumulates in the bone marrow and ovaries.
The MHRA was the recipient of a $7.5m donation from The Gates Foundation.
Likewise:
The Guardian $12.2m
The BBC media unit $51.4m
Imperial College $302.1m
Tony Blair Institute $18.8m
Obviously these concerns remain truly independent and have in no way been influenced by the objectives of global corporate NWO fascism 😷
Once more altogether guys and girls, this time with feeling :
“DEPOPULATION”
Excellent interview
https://rumble.com/vishfj-dr.-roger-hodkinson-explains-risks-of-covid-vaccines-side-effects.html
‘One of our problems here is the assumption that this is like every other vaccine we’ve ever seen – and its not’ – Dr Robert Malone.
Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology. Mr. Steve Kirsch is a serial entrepreneur who has been researching adverse reactions to COVID vaccines.
Must watch ….
Spike protein is very dangerous, it’s cytotoxic (Robert Malone, Steve Kirsch, Bret Weinstein)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du2wm5nhTXY
Spike Protein & Immune Escape – Dr Robert Malone (Inventor mRNA Vaccines)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMB1dRJNHe8
“I would still have the vaccine again. I have had family members die from Covid. ”
She’s 34. Her risk of dying from CV19 is close to zero.
But she wants a second vaccination jab because someone else in her family has died despite the side effects she’s already had, and without any mention of their age or comorbidities.
If she gets vaccinated then her chances of getting Covid are greatly reduced and therefore her chances of infecting another family member (who might well be old or have comorbidities but nevertheless has a right to life).
People have a finite time on this earth. At some point, we will all die. If we are old with comorbidities then we have to accept our days are numbered. Covid may be the vehicle that takes us from this life, though it is often flu or pneumonia. (Strangely enough there are deaths from other causes apart from covid.)
But young people are not susceptible to covid. They don’t need a vaccine to reduce their chances of getting it. It is not a killer for them as they have an effective immune system. So it is highly improbable that covid would be the vehicle that takes them early from life. But already a great number have died from the so-called ‘vaccine.’
Yes – incredible isn’t it – at 34 the chances of her catching and dying from covid is almost non-existent – and if your are asymptomatic the chances of you passing it on are once again practically zero – the vaccines do not even guarantee immunity and do not guarantee you won’t pass it on – so basically the vaccines are creating a false sense of security with many people beleiving they will never get covid after the jab and never pass it on … like mask wearing its little more than a comfort blanket and for some others just an opportinity to virtue signal. I only know of one person who admits to having regrets about taking up the vaccine offer after suffering some very bad side-effects (severe headaches for a week) and is now in a constant daily worry about these side effects returning – I suspect that regardless of the evidence now emerging of many unforeseen reactions that these trial vaccines are inducing many of those who took up the vaccination offer are never going to acknowledge the existence of these vaccine issues because frankly the consequences of what they may have let themselves in for when… Read more »
Just back from a Sunday drink with the Mrs at my local spit n saw dust boozer in the Essex badlands . Spent 3hrs listening to endless tales of so and so’s very bad reaction to the jab but worst of all I have just found out about and old and good friend has now been diagnosed with Leukaemia after two weeks of severe reactions to the jab . Obviously the jab didn’t give her leukaemia but according to the medics treating her it accelerated the onset of the illness . She has two fine young sons and her husband is an old school friend , the whole family is well loved and respected locally . In shock and saddened by this news , pray she pulls through . I fear this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Back in Summer 2020 senior scientists were recommending rigorous pharmacovilance upon the vaccine rollout to try to identify risks not identified in the shortened clinical trials.
The government didn’t do this, but instead used only the desperately inadequate yellow card system.
I presume that this was because they didn’t want to know about any problems as they emerged.
What are we living through?
Maybe a genocide of plebs. In very slow motion.
Prince Charles.. Stanley and Boris.. Gates.. all want fewer plebs.. fewer poor people running about on the planet god gave them…
Who’d have thunk it?
“MTF” occurs 116 times on this page. That is mad. I am going to give it a break before I go crazy. Thanks for all the interesting points. I apologise to anyone who is left with an unanswered question or challenge.
And still there are people lining up to get this stuff jabbed into their bodies! Incredible!
then they can go on holiday innit? lol
I am fascinated when people mention they have family member(s) who died from COVID? You have to pretty unlucky. However, the issue with adverse events linked to heavy periods, period in menopausal women happening all over the USA,. CDC VAERS now reporting nearly 6,000 people have died post vaccine and well over 1 quarter of a milllion adverse events to date.
The only people reporting on this properly are UK Column. We need to take this seriously folks. The MHRA, Government et. al couldn’t give a f…!
We really need to get more focus on the role of the spike protein that is created after vaccination. It’s supposed to stay on site but in empirical reality is spreading to all parts of the body hence the wide variety of adverse events. However, a particular site is women’s reproductive organs (ovaries). Great podcast discussing this by Darkhorse Podcasts, which you can find the full 3hr discussion on BitChute https://www.bitchute.com/video/TH2HAmTp40xq/ and highlighted sections of it on YouTube https://youtu.be/XMxuNvVgxlU . (The full episode was on there but got censored!).
Very informative.