We haven’t yet reached lockdown’s “terminus date“, but Government officials are already signalling that restrictions could be reintroduced in weeks if the Covid situation becomes “unacceptable”.
Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty said on Thursday that a “scary” growth in hospitalisations could leave the NHS “in trouble again surprisingly fast“, meaning that in “five, six, seven eight weeks’ time”, the Prime Minister may need to “look again” at reintroducing restrictions.
A Government minister has this morning echoed Whitty’s warning, telling Sky News that: “Of course, if we get into a situation where it’s unacceptable and we do need to put back further restrictions, then that, of course, is something the Government will look at.” The MailOnline has more.
Solicitor General Lucy Frazer suggested it was the right time to open up because of the vaccination drive – which has reached 90% of Britons.
But with cases continuing to soar, hospital admissions tracking above some of SAGE’s worst-case projections, and deaths having hit a four-month high, she warned that Number 10 may be left with no choice but to consider reimposing tough restrictions. …
England’s Chief Medical Officer last night cautioned the U.K. could still “get into trouble again surprisingly fast” and hospitals may face “scary numbers” within a matter of weeks.
Making it clear the country was not on an irreversible path to freedom despite Number 10 pushing ahead with step four of the ‘roadmap’ to normality on Monday, Professor Chris Whitty said: “We are not by any means out of the woods yet.” …
The Prime Minister [has] sounded a cautious note… and called on people not to “go wild” and immediately rush to take advantage of the final easing – which includes lifting work-at-home orders and reopening nightclubs. …
Saying restrictions should be eased on July 19th, Ms Frazer told Sky News: “I think the Health Secretary has been very clear, as has the Prime Minister, that we will see infections rise. …
“It is really important that we get the balance right between ensuring that we keep this virus under control and we take the necessary clinical measures to do that, but that we also recognise that there are consequences of not opening up and not allowing people to go about their daily lives.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
so why did they close Nightingale?
Because we spent billions paying people not to work and therefore didn’t have billions to hire enough workers (not all needed medical training as we have seen in past epidemics) to staff them. Opportunity cost but them on the bum.
All very well but given they didn’t have the billions in the first place, and they’ve made clear that they are prepared to “print” as much money as they need, why did opportunity cost kick in at that particular point?
And the bureaucracy failings preventing the best part of 40,000 qualified volunteers from helping out have never been satisfactorily explained.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9097533/Red-tape-blamed-5-000-40-000-retired-NHS-workers-volunteered-given-jobs.html
No.
Govt knew they wouldn’t be needed. Pure Fear theatre.
Tess Lawrie explains why the vaccine rollout must be halted By Neville Hodgkinson
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/tess-lawrie-explains-why-the-vaccine-rollout-must-be-halted/
Stand in South Hill Park Bracknell every Sunday from 10am meet fellow anti lockdown freedom lovers, keep yourself sane, make new friends and have a laugh.
Join our Stand in the Park – Bracknell – Telegram Group
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Home Schooling – Ex-Primary School Teacher on Resistance GB YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZ5oS2ejye0
https://www.hopesussex.co.uk/our-mission
I was talking to a commissioning engineer from BOC yesterday who explained what a huge job it had been to provide the UK’s hospitals (and the Nightingales) with additional Oxygen capacity to get them through the early months of the pandemic. It required highly specialised, medical grade components that weren’t readily available off the shelf, and the costs reflected this. To see that the installations cost so much and then got so little use tells you all you need to know about the judgement of he people running the NHS!
Well the judgement of those running the NHS may well be poor but the Nightingales were essentially a political stunt, probably aimed at increasing the level of fear. The blame lies squarely with the Cabinet and the MPs who vote for their policies
Yes. That’s very true. It was quite obvious that the Nightingales were about as popular as a fart in a space suit to the established NHS management, who wanted any additional funding to be wasted by their existing general hospitals.
The thing is that the desk jockeys responsible for NHS policies – like Simon Stephens at the top, then on down – are political appointments. As such they have turned many medical staff into puppets, rather than ethically driven professionals.
“ethically driven professionals“
Yes, “ethically driven professionals” in medicine generally have covered themselves in glory through this panic.
Oh, sorry, no, it’s the opposite isn’t it. In the real world, top medical professionals (the ones generally recognised and applauded as “ethical”) have fallen over themselves (with a few notable exceptions) to push panic at every opportunity.
Ethics disappeared in medicine a long time ago. I remember (in the 80s) that drug reps would invite the whole practice and friends to a dinner in a good restaurant. The GMC then made them reduce this to doctors only and with some sort of presentation of the drug they were selling.
At the same time, in Germany, doctors and dentists were invited on holiday to Brazil(!!!). This is hearsay, unfortunately – I didn’t experience this largesse. I have little faith in doctors today. I’d love to hear from someone who would confirm or refute that such practices exist now.
Or have chosen to stay silent in the face of overwhelming evidence that contradicted the narrative of the day. – Shameful
For which he is then knighted – utterly utterly corrupt
The real answer is that they weren’t needed. They were never needed.
You can come up with fantasies regarding equipment or O2 supplies, but that’s pointless.
Staffing is interesting, but pointless. There is no surfeit of medical professionals just hanging around waiting for a ‘Global Pandemic tm’ to descend. The same as hospital beds, commissioning new professionals is based on forecasts, what may be needed, there is no over-provision, just in case… Also, it takes 4 years for a newly-qualified, wet-behind-the-ears to hit the wards.
Have a great weekend, I’m going to get pissed.
I’m already pissed.
Have been for a year and a half.
…but not in a good way.
Because nobody was ever willing to hire people to operate them. In other words, they were never meant to be used.
There were instances reported that Trusts who identified patients to transfer to the Nightingales, were told they had to supply the staff to care for them.
A bit like being invited to an ‘all you can eat’ buffet but you must pay for and bring all your own food, drink, crockery, cutlery etc – and clear up after yourself. Oh, and be prepared to muck in, in any capacity, to enable the smooth running of the buffet if the organisers have cocked up in any way…
Optics.
Because it was nothing but theatre from the off
because it was for theatre and effect of adding to the fear. Over the past 20 years consecutive governments have reduced the number of NHS beds by 20k or more. That tells you all you need too know.
Because hardly anyone’s death is speeded by Covid without multiple underlying conditions. So the oncologists and cardiologists etc have to be around – it’s not about just beds with oxygen supply.
Like the ventilators, they were a nonsense from the start.
Chris Whitty should be renamed Chris Whittle
After a full vaccination programme the NHS should never be ‘in trouble’ at all. Otherwise what was the point.
If there isn’t the capacity now, then we need more capacity. The NHS is there to insure society, not the other way around.
?
It is utterly barmy that the amount of freedom one has to live their life as they choose is essentially directly connected to the competence of their local NHS Management Team.
a reason to scrap government provision/rationing of treatment.
My pets get prompter, swifter better higher-quality care by more interested staff.
Wouldn’t that be an insult to the late great Sir Frank?
Sir Frank never generated as much whining as Whitty.
Oh yes he did – straight out of the burner cans….
The ‘pressure’ meme is purely a political arse-covering exercise to conceal two massive political foul-ups :
Currently we are seeing the preparation of autumn diversions aimed at excusing these massive errors.
Having cake and eating it time, I see.
Either our health service was perfectly adequate to deal with covid, and the panic response was “hysteria”, or there was “under-supply of provision” and the hysteria was a sensible response.
Clearly, the former is true, but those who want to push an underlying agenda of increasing collective healthcare spending are incentivised to pretend the latter. And if they also want to push the argument that there was “hysteria” they are left in the aforementioned self-contradictory position.
It subsidises low wage employers.
It would be nice to think that was all it was, Rick. But that doesn’t explain why the same fear tactics “vaccine” agenda is being pushed in other countries with good healthcare provision.
The many failures in the NHS from many governments may mean that particular tactic is more believable here though.
Chris Shitty?
He should be renamed Condemned Prisoner Whitty and then The Late Chris Whitty.
You’re assuming the “vaccines” work.
Which is increasingly obvious they don’t. This would explain the insane rush to medicate the whole world before the next respiratory infection season because it will become blindingly clear then.
What exactly is UNACCEPTABLE????
Think of any number, multiple or divide it by 10 and it’s unacceptable.
People asking too many questions?
The sub text must be that some of the opinionated twats will be out of lucrative jobs unless they keep the fear going.
Look at the enormous ‘prisons’ being built in Wellingborough and elsewhere. They are not just prisons, they are detention centres for those who continue to resist fascism, they are re-education camps and will be operational soon.
It’s tyranny, whether left or right, is Faucism. They meet in evil. This diabolical blend of ruthless profit chasing, willingness to kill unwanted members of the population and state control reeks of Communist China though. That’s the model Faucist Ferguson openly admires. Their soft power strategy lies behind this.
Hispitalisations rising at a rate even higher than worse case predictions?
Just who writes thus complete and utter garbage, amd why the fuck is it aired onnthis site without even the slightest of comment to the contrary.
I avoid the news media, specifically because of this crap.
Indeed, the lying piece of doggy excrement:
“But with cases continuing to soar, hospital admissions tracking above some of SAGE’s worst-case projections, and deaths having hit a four-month high, she warned that No10 may be left with no choice but to consider reimposing tough restrictions.”
The question is why the MSM let her get away with such LIES.
Well France doesn’t require to spend fortunes on detention centres, its decided instead to make the whole country one!
In this nation proud of its egality and freedom, rather than playing at ‘opening-up’ its going full apartheid. And if the stats of 621 admissions to hospitals in the UK makes you wonder what Whitty is on, then the logic for the French move is clear. Yesterday 213 new covid patients were admitted to hospital, and 178 were sent home, a fear inducing net increase of 35 patients across a country with more or less the same population as UK. Patients in ICUs went down by 17 and deaths were 16 which is all of 1% of the total deaths over the last 24 hours.
Money.
“But of course, minister, before resorting to profoundly illiberal and costly social and economic restrictions, you will have made preparations in terms of emergency NHS capacity to address this potential danger you describe, and have had more than a year to prepare for now. Please tell us about the extra capacity you are preparing to house respiratory virus sufferers in purpose-built separate facilities where cross-infection is not an issue and staff don’t have to “isolate” and go off work at the first ping of a false positive, recruiting and training volunteers and medical staff, etc”
…said no mainstream media “journalist” ever.
Is this minister part of the government of that well-known, bold, closet libertarian Alexander “Boris” Johnson, he of the “irreversible” lifting of restrictions?
When is the LS editorial team going to accept that the PM is a full collaborator in the war being waged on the British people, and that he is part of the problem, not the solution?
That’s all true, but the other sad truth is that thanks to the “opposition” (political and media) almost universally positioning itself to the “more insane totalitarianism” side of the debate, the Johnson regime has been enabled to position itself as the voice of (relative) reason.
I’m not saying there’s a more appealing alternative at the moment, but we need a long term campaign against this madness and a long term move to replace the Tory party with a conservative party. We may as well start now.
Absolutely. I started many years ago, as far as the latter is concerned..
There is no opposition in a very real sense. That is the whole story, and why conventional political rhetoric is irrelevant – beyond the fact that the old two-dimensional descriptors were already pretty useless.
In both Tory and Labour parties, what you see is the contemporary Party of each ilk, suborned by a take-over (backed by dumb compliance) that we might never have envisaged in saner times.
Bluntly, you are seeing a metamorphosis of the old into something new – and frankly I can’t see normal service being resumed any time soon.
We agree on the outward shape of the situation, for sure – that there is no effective political opposition, and that the Parliamentary parties essentially represent the same people and ideology.
I would say that the underlying political descriptors are fundamental, probably universals of human nature (there will always be conservatives and radicals, and there will always be liberals and authoritarians, though their positions on particular issues will adapt with changing context), but the political party descriptors bear no resemblance to who or what they purport to represent.
And we agree that we are seeing something new emerging (a culmination of a long process, imo) and we are not easily going to fight it, even if we could agree on what we want back.
and that is why I say that current political parties are anachronistic – the next GE will be very difficult for people who can think for themselves
I fear there is not going to be another general election in a form we know and understand. One of the Blair governments enacted contingency legislation enabling a minister to suspend elections in the event of a national emergency, such as the one we are now experiencing, which the government shows no sign of ending soon .
That’s the most terrifying prediction of the day, and I’m sure it’s true, unless the peoples see what is happening and rise up. Events may yet intervene.
Aye, hospitals will soon be crammed full of people being treated for no symptoms !
Or ‘Asymptomatic Long Covid’, as ‘no symptoms’ will be known in future!
don’t mock it, no symptoms can lead people to believe that they are well and do not require medications! this is very very bad for profits
I heard some expert pontificating on the Radio (BBC of course) this morning about how “dangerous” this virus is “because it can spread without causing any symptoms and is therefore difficult to detect”. Seriously.
Wow, that really is dangerous, a virus that spreads and doesn’t make people ill.
Indeed, I thought I had made some progress when two of my closest old friends from uni days, who are, alas, full-on Covidians, readily agreed with me that most ‘cases’ of Covid are asymptomatic (i.e. what we used to call healthy people) but, it turns out, they did not mean that his alleged Killer Virus from the East is thoroughly innocuous for most people but that vast numbers of people will die from it despite not getting sick. Amazing! Four years of university, and this is what you get. Yikes!
One thing you should have learned at university is that there are a lot of very stupid people at university and the possession of a degree is not proof of intelligence.
Hospital admissions for COVID in the UK. Currently running at 2674 weekly.
Hospital patients for COVID. Current numnber is 3412.
There are a total of 1257 hospitals in the UK.
THERE IS NO CRISIS.
patients graph:
Furthermore, feedback from those in hospitals says that the people who are going into hospital with COVID are being treated and released quickly.
They are people who, this time last year, would not have been admitted to hospital at all. If hospitals have capacity, sick people will come, and be admitted.
This is all good news. The NHS is coping much better than last year, there are fewer very sick people, numbers of deaths remain very low, and the NHS is getting better at treating people.
It’s summer. It’s a seasonal virus. A very high percentage have natural immunity.
This is nothing to do with any improvement in the NHS.
Anyone who hasn’t lost patience with this government.
So despite it now being very clear that restrictions have little or no effect on case numbers once it’s endemic (compare Sweden and the sensibke US states with the locktivist ones), the answer is still always ‘more of what demonstrably doesn’t work, but causes massive problems in every other area of society, economy and healthcare’.
We really are living in a post-science age of superstition (which has now been renamed “The Science”).
We are still well below the models forecast. If the vaccine works as promised, the number of potentially seriously ill people will fall (about 40% of “Covid admissions” came in for another reason and tested positive only after admission). It’s a finite population of potentially ill, most of the unvaccinated remain young (older people who refuse to be jab have exercised their free right and know the risks). You would need a catastrophic spread (which we have not seen at any time in this pandemic) or for the vaccine to fail. If the vaccine fails, you have to live with Covid because there is no alternative then, and society cannot financially or socially remade for a virus with an IFR of .2 and an average age of death at life expectancy. She is talking about walking down the 0 Covid street and that will destroy us.
‘older people who refuse to be jab[bed] have exercised their free right and know the risks’. Very true – we know how truly risky are these experimental pseudo-vaccines with no medium or long-term safety testing!
… and beyond that (speaking as a real world old fart), there is a matter of principle. Accepting the artificial rush to promote these vaccines, whatever the outcome might ultimately be, is a betrayal of science and rational assessment.
‘ … with no medium or long-term safety testing!‘
Or any benefit.
“If the vaccine fails, you have to live with Covid because there is no alternative then,“
Since this is not a vaccine that gives sterilising immunity, or anything close to it, how can it not “fail”, if the objective is zero covid?
Your “if” seems empty, and we do indeed have to “live with covid” (as many of us predicted from the start). Fortunately there’s no reason to suppose “living with covid” need be materially any different from living before covid (unless we continue to allow fear and totalitarian manipulative zealotry to take charge).
The “if” was only there because vaccines have been seen as the savior for months. When false gods fail, you get back to your life before you joined the religion.
Fair enough. I did suspect that I wasn’t saying anything you would disagree with.
“If the vaccine fails, you have to live with Covid because there is no alternative …”
Which is inevitable, anyway, and not so scary. What a daft idea that a vaccine can ‘control’ a virus. Pure nonsense devised by significance-seeking sociopaths with financial interests.
The line graph posted by ‘realarthurdent’ shows one fascinating anomaly : the greater number of admissions after the introduction of the vaccine (forgetting the major issue of validity of the data).
Of course I agree. Every where I can I remind people the IFR is around .2, average age of death over 80. It can and should be lived with and only those who think we can cheat death promise otherwise. I took my 2 jabs because I was promised when all the over 50s were done (I’m 50 exactly) we get our lives back. I was duped. I’m not afraid of the vaccines (want more data); but I hate being made a chump!
It’s not so much being ‘afraid’ of the vaccines. But I don’t snort cocaine either – and much more is known about that.
I presume DoctorC is a presumption or a wish. No doctor of medicine who has done any research into this scam would be vaccinated. Your posts are full of propaganda – “If the vaccine fails”. We know it’s not a vaccine. Indeed, anyone with half a brain who knows anything about the spread if influenza knows that covid – IF it ever existed – disappeared a year ago. We know that the whole thing is based on the misuse of “the Tests” so what are you even doing hypothesising about it? You’re obviously a Quisling. Get off this website.
Except there probably is an alternative, i.e. Ivermectin.
Except there
probablyis an alternative, i.e. Ivermectin.Not heard of Ivermectin then? When the gene therapy (please stop using the word vaccine as it does not fit the classic description) fails we’ll have to use the medicines we already have which are cheap and work.
“. If the vaccine fails, you have to live with Covid because there is no alternative”
Or, Ivermectin could be approved for use in this country, either for treatment or prophylaxis. Then the pandemic would be over.
Ivermectin? HCQ/zinc? Budesonide? Vits D&C? Fluvoxamine?
Destroying us is the aim.
Confirming what I’ve been saying for a while: they are drawing the end of restrictions out as much as they can so they can generate public outcry, then later on they’ll start manufacturing a new wave, and they will blame it on restrictions being lifted because people insisted on them. So it’s all the people’s fault, not theirs, and there will be no end to the lockdowns because we saw how bad it is.
I read this with anger in my heart. I am here in the Uk and find all the restrictions, track and trace etc utterly apaling.
I will NOt have the nhs app and I will NOT give out my UK phone number.
Had to pay for the two pcr tests but took no notice of the isolation rules. How can anyone ‘self-isolate’ when they are staying with friends?
The covid zealots make my blood boil and I cannot believe how people can be so stupid.
July the 24th is when we can yet again, forlornly hope that the msm and the governemnt will take notice. Fat chance of that happening though!!!!
Perhaps Boris has forgotten something essential:
Lockdowns are a political decision, not an act of nature.
He chooses it. He has chosen to throw out hundreds of years of best practice that formed the 2019 WHO playbook because one of the three most repressive regimes globally did it and claimed (ha) it stopped Covid (they still claim less infections than Ghana). He chose to kneel to pressure while others followed tried and true practices. He chose this path even after it failed in the Spring, failed in November and failed this year.
Lockdown has always been a choice, not a must. If only Professor Gupta had been at the table and not Professor Never Been Close, he would have chosen a different path. He can choose another path from here on out. It’s a choice Boris, show some moral courage!
Courage? The PM has been unchallenged leader of a regime that has waged war on its own people. At this point we don’t want courage or anything else from him, he needs to be charged with misfeasance in public office and banished forever. He’s not a victim, he’s the Number 1 perpetrator.
Banished to where? He needs to be hanged.
Unfortunately a large part of the population now seems to regard them as an inevitable and acceptable response to scaremongering. And they are also under the illusion that the restrictions actually do what the propagandists claim, which a basic understanding of the stats will show is nonsense.
“ Boris, show some moral courage!“
I spluttered my food over the table at that ridiculous notion.
‘Moral’ and ‘Courage’ are two words never, ever associated with Mr Toad!
”Brits Will “Of Course” Face New Lockdown”
I didnt realise there was anyone who did not already know this
The LS team?
The many members of the public who have continued to believe all the lies?
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/07/paul-craig-roberts/how-the-covid-pandemic-was-orchestrated/
Of course they will.
The plan must be executed and the control group must be erased.
Fuck off and die!
+1
So much for irreversible then! I for one will become a violent protestor if the next lockdown materialises – or should that be when?
Read this before getting violent.
https://off-guardian.org/2021/07/15/the-approaching-storm/
I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.
Mahatma Gandhi
Governments tend to only pay attention to violence
Ghandi’s non-violence succeeded because he was up against the only government on the planet that wouldn’t have used violence to suppress him.
That’s actually precisely the case: The UK government of then came to the conclusion that supressing resurrection in India would imply to keep paying the Indian army. And that was something they weren’t willing to do, using the pretext that it could well “mutiny” again.
as Mandela said, the oppressors chooses the means of the struggle
Violence only doesn’t work when you pick the wrong targets. It’s worked plenty of times when it’s hurt the people who make the decisions.
How successful do you think Gandhi could have been against Stalin, Mao, Hitler &c.?
For the moment, anyway, violence of any kind will be counter productive. The Faucists are hoping for it. It would enable them to crush dissent even further.
No violence, even of the egg throwing kind, until a large proportion of the people are awakened.
A bit like the novel “The Neverending Story”, where, to quote the Wikipedia synopis, “all the residents of the city have leapt voluntarily into The Nothing. There, thanks to the irresistible pull of the destructive phenomenon, the Fantasticans are becoming lies in the human world.”
If it’s the gift that goes on giving, then I’ll also pass on that, thanks.
I have only an FM radio in my bathroom, and rather foolishly, turned it on to “Today” whilst I shaved, only to hear this woman nattering on about this, whilst resisting the urge to cut my throat. There then followed a depressing parroting reprise of the garbage on talkRadio, where, unfortunately, Hartley-Brewer is “en vacances”; else H-B would have had a bloody good go at Frazer.
Is the ‘scary growth’ due to millions who now need urgent treatment having been abandoned for 18 months and also possibly the jabbed who according to the yellow cards are having numerous problems
We are still vaccinating, and we know it produces a surge in infections.
90% vaccinated but infections soar?
How can this be?
We were promised that vaccines would set us free
I don’t understand
(Yes I am taking the piss)
Because cases are mainly the young who have only recently been able to have their first jab and haven’t had long enough to get their second, so many are still in the first three weeks post vaccination.
So once those young that have chosen to do so go for their second, covid will be no more and we won’t need any further restrictions or even to discuss covid anymore? That’ll be it right? Three weeks to flatten the curve!
Wouldn’t that be nice, but then we will be discussing deaths from the vaccine, both known and long term which will reveal themselves over time.
I didn’t say vaccines were good: they have an effect but the extent of the effect is still up for debate, but I think it is clear that for most people who have survived their vaccination there is a reasonable level of immunity.
However, in my view it would be better to let the young acquire an infecton and develop natural immunity (since they are at worst inconvenienced by it for a few days) rather than to go into full panic mode like the gov and MSM are doing.
For the record I decided to have the vaccination on the balance of risks for a 75 yo. I will not be having a booster as so much more has come to light about risks since February.
For the person who didn’t like those facts they can verify for themselves from the government stats website that in the UK the two highest groups of test postives (aka cases) are 15-19 and 20-24 with significant numbers both younger and up to 15 years older. 38+ started July 1: 35+ July 7 and when the panic set in they offered it to over 20s. No-one who was vaccinated in those groups has had time to acquire reliable immunity as they are still in the first 3 weeks post-jab. They are still however listed as vaccinated by the ZOE app, which is where the scary stuff is coming from.
Its touching that you believe it confers immunity. As someone who has been vaccinated it is understandable why you hang onto that belief. There is probably good grounds to think it creates some antibodies which help to fight the virus and thus diminish some of the possible symptoms. But immunity? No.
Peter McCullough v good on this in his interview with France Soir.
As the manufacturers of these experimental jabs admit, they do not confer immunity, but merely mitigate the effects of the virus for those who catch it.
And, as has been pointed out ad nauseum, a positive case following a PCR test, does not equate to an infectious case.
You do know that the pharmas that make the jabs explicitly say that their vaccines don’t provide immunity, right?
I know it’s hard to believe given how once you know that everything starts to seem completely nonsensical. But that’s just how it is. These jabs do not confer immunity from anything. Never did. Never meant to.
The magnitude of what is happening is so mind-boggling that it’s hard to believe. I know.
Bollocks – sheer unadulterated bollocks: Coronaviruses are 80+% identical at the gene level so previous exposure to them would grant a level of immunity – please listen to Dr Mike Yeadon ( who knows about these matters) if you consider me , a non scientist, ill equipped to comment. And in case you are not aware , no jab currently confers a protection against infection or transmission and positive cases via LFT and RT PCR swabs do NOT detect infectiousness ( viral load ) or distinguish between live or non live virus RNA/DNA. Test positives aka cases is the biggest fraud and you have swallowed it hollow; even HMG on their own websites states that no test conducted in the UK by either LFT/PCR should be judged in isolation as the result cannot be relied upon. If it is “good enough” for HMG, why do you trot out the rubbish above – because no one in Whitehall/the Cabinet Office or even SAGE believes it – or you.
Can you share your data please?
Age
Number of jabs
Time since jab1/2
Thanks
And are any of them actually ill, rather than having a positive test result?
Are they real infections, or viral particles from earlier asymptomatic,l infection, i.e. they have healthy immune systems which have dealt with the virus as they’re supposed to.
Oh, fuck off, Norman….
Utter garbage.
And last summer?
FFS please stop referring to these jabs as “vaccinations’; there are many definitions, but because these jabs do not prevent infection or have any prophylactic effect on transmission of high load symptomatic individuals, they ARE NOT VACCINATIONS.
They are experimental use approved only gene therapy MRNA cytotoxins being injected into your body in the hope that a 4 stage process then is successfully completed so that the injected spike protein induces an immunological response where antigens cause antibodies and T cells fight the virus. US microbiologists have found that the injected cytotoxin can spread to every chromosome in your body with as yet unknown long term effects – some injected people may not experience any side effects but the incidence of blood related clotting in the brain heart and lungs immediately post injection confirms just how cavalier the UK MHRA/US CDC and others have rushed to “approve” these poisons being put into your blood stream. As I type the WHO have registered 6000+ deaths worldwide from these poison jabs, 1400+ in the UK and many hundreds of thousand Yellow Card incidents. If that doesn’t scare you what will. Anti Tetanus jab doses have been administered in the hundreds of billions – WHO has recorded < 20 deaths – that is what I regard as a “safe” treatment – I am the living proof of that having had several anti T jabs in my life.
This twerp said, on Talkradio this morning, that we are in the middle of a pandemic. Strange kind of pandemic. We are doing massive amounts of inappropriate testing and finding lot’s of ‘positives’ which govt then mutate into ‘infections’. And anyone dying stands a high chance of being Covid, irrespective of reality. Even then, the low numbers across the board don’t define a pandemic in any way. It states more clearly that the govt is lying and outrageously forcing untested pharmaceuticals on an unsuspecting population.
All-cause mortality in 2021 is pretty low. Even in 2020 it was only as high as 2008 I think. Where’s the pandemic?
Here are the death rates (totals, crude rate, and age adjusted) going back to 1990.
Nothing to see.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/deathsintheukfrom1990to2020
“Strange kind of pandemic”
Indeed ’tis. I don’t think many people have clocked that this ‘pandemic’ didn’t reach official ‘epidemic’ levels in the community, even at its worst.
The test of any pandemic is the number of dead bodies in the street. I hate having to step over the newly deceased when I take the dog out.
Yes, having to step over them becomes quite annoying, especially when encountering a particularly large pile and being forced to skirt around them. Oh, and the smell!
Why won’t the council’s sort this out? What are we paying our council tax for? Trying to get some sense out of them is a joke; all I get from them is: ‘cutbacks … priorities … safety of employees … sorry sir, we are in the middle of a pandemic’. Pretty poor if you ask me! Surely it wouldn’t take, or cost, that much just to gather them up, take them to some field and burn them like they did with all those cows?
I slipped a disc the other day when I fell trying to climb over the corpses.
Could we get rid of the data analysts, maybe that would help? Oh and the behavioural scientists?
No. The data is what tells the truth when not being falsified or manipulated.
For as long as the Whittypath and his accomplices are still in charge of something, “we” obviously won’t ever get “out of the woods”.
The PM is in charge. If he really didn’t like the messages Whitty was sending out, he could/would/should have told him to shut up. At this point between SAGE, Whitty, Vallance and the Cabinet and the PM I don’t much care whose hand is up whose arse, they can all go to Hell.
“The PM” in charge of getting is current bedmate pregnant and happily delegates anything more involved to whoever will volunteer for it.
Quite possibly. Whether his sins are of omission or commission, he’s guilty as Hell.
I think the signs are pretty obvious: Why are all these functionally relatively minor people rushing to do “press releases” whenver they want a certain policy to be implemented? Whitty is supposed to be a government advisor and not a disaster celebrity publically lobbying for certain policies with complete disregard for the so-called “prime minister”.
There’s a nice German proverb: “Wenn die Katze aus dem Haus ist, tanzen die Mäuse auf dem Tisch.”, English “When the cat is AWOL, the mice are dancing on the table”.
Indeed. You’d think others in the Cabinet would step up. They really all are the most disgraceful bunch ever to be in office.
… which leads me to the conclusion that both advisors and cabinet are actively complicit.
As others have said, any advisor speaking out of turn is normally sacked. If they aren’t, they are speaking under the licence of a suprior.
“Never attribute to malice what could equally well be explained by mere stupidity” is still a wisdom. Boris Bacon-Roll is a bungling clown with little interest in anything beyond his own jokes and his sex life, ie, while there is some part of his body which has more structural consistency than a jellfish, it’s not his spine. And when you put such a non-entity in charge of a country, it will end up being run by people willing to put sufficient criminal energy into furthering whatever hobby horses they happen to have in their stables.
Eg, in Germany, sale of fireworks and going for a walk after 9pm was made illegal “because of COVID!”.
Isn’t the usual English version of that proverb “when the cat’s away the mice will play”?
I have no idea. I’m German and not English.
The PM gets briefed every morning about the latest ‘secret’ polling . And every day he is persuaded that the majority support vaccines, probably mandatory, and whatever lockdown restrictions are required. At the same time and by the same people he gets briefed about the necessary campaigns required to ensure the population continues to support his policies, and what psyop fine tuning is required.
Give or take time differences, exactly the same briefing occurs with the leaders of Germany, France, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and one or two other countries. The leader of the US ( whoever that is currently with Biden sitting in the oval office) has already agreed the briefing the day before. The briefing is given by the same US company in all countries.
and the US is the prime mover in this catastrophe through their direct and then indirect funding of GoF research from the early 1990’s onward ( initially in US. BSL4 labs ), notwithstanding the “leak” appears to have come from the Wuhan BSL2 lab. Fauci has a great deal to answer for, as have Dazsak, Farrar, Bat Lady, Vallance and many others. If you cannot sleep read Dr David Martin’s analysis of US Patents registered since the early 1990’s relating to all aspects of SARS – if that does not convince folks that therein lies the biggest cover up in the history of the US. No wonder they want to investigate the “lab leak” theory.
Freedom day LMFAO.
Looking forward to seeing some stats regards cases and hospittialisations of the ‘vaccinated’.
I’ve not seen any new data since June 25th.
The country has been signed up to Covid and spent the money, now the bailiffs are at the door
From here.
https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/covid-19-hospital-activity/.
so that’s approx. 1.3% of occupied beds with covid patients on 1st July.
Do you think someone will tell Whitty?
I am trying to get together a few big lads so that we can “explain it” to him.
Hasn’t somebody already tried that??
The number of Covid patients actually in hospital is going up very slowly. There are about 1200 hospitals in UK and 3600 patients (with Covid but not necessarily admitted for it) so typically 3 per hospital.
Does that sound like an emegency?
Especially when you consider the NHS on a normal day has 36,000 people in hospital for planned treatment, presumably not including emergency admissions, and we know that they are not operating at anywhere near normal levels at the moment if you figure in the backlog.
Total number of beds occupied is over 118,000. That I think is more like winter crisis numbers and begs the question what are they all in for.
Lockdown caused a crisis in the NHS, to save the NHS we need more lockdown.
Masks failed completely to stop the infection. Infections are rising we need more masks.
When the vulnerable are vaccinated we can cry freedom.
The vaccinated are still catching covid, vaccinate them again.
More lockdown more masks more vaccines.
Incompetent politicians pandering to a population living in fear because of the lies the politicians and their advisers pump out on a daily basis.
The scientific method crushed by corrupt scientists with both eyes on their next grant.
Lockdowns are no longer about protecting the population, at the moment they are about protecting a failing NHS.
In the future they will be about total population control.
Have a good weekend.
Well they are certainly not Covid cases. 3,600 out of 118,000 is just 3%.
Hospitalization growth has outstepped the growth of “cases” for the first time in months a couple of days ago.
NB: In my opinion, the most likely cause for this is “someone found a way to fiddle with these numbers” and/ or considered it necessary to apply such a method again.
Hospitalsation growth does not take into account discharges, which is why I used current patient numbers, not admissions. The reports I have seen indicate a typical stay for a Covid patient is 2 days to give them oxygen to cope with the worst of the infection.
There are no covid patients in hospital.
There are many patients with many diverse illnesses in hospital. Many of them, like the president of Madagascar’s goat, tested positive for “covid” using the Drosten PCR test. We should force the hopitals/test centres to stipulate how many cycles they are using to infer a positive. If it’s over 20 (hint – it will be) it’s a false positive.
That was the now-deceased President Magafuli of Tanzania. I think the goat’s still alive though.
This is getting serious
Yesterday 14,242 people from my street were admitted to hospital with covid
I’ve had long covid 12 times. 4 times consecutively and 8 times concurrently
Luckily the only symptom is mild fatigue that I’ve had since I was 12
Should we have a control group of the bone idle to compare with the long covidians?
Long Covid ate my homework!
It’s worse after a bender…..